Al, Not everyone who posts on the lists are insiders.
If you want some insider info, go to the actual people doing the work, like Don Brown. http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=struts-dev&m=114369603519450&w=2 Hubert On 3/30/06, Al Eridani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 3/29/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > You need to pay attention to the credibility of who is doing the > > "describing" that you are referring to. > > I just go by what the insiders have published here. If the insiders have > no credibility, let's turn off the lights and go home. > > When the WebWork deal was announced it was made clear that WebWork > was so much better that there was no point in trying to shoehorn it in > the current codebase, but a new Struts Action 2 was going to be created > that was going to be, essentially, WebWork. > > The current Struts, so bad that it could not be fixed, was going to be > re-christened as Struts Action 1 and, for all intents and purposes, > mothballed. > > Of course, it was not put this bluntly, but that was the gist of it. > > Now, to me this qualifies more as a takeover than a merger; a revolution > not evolution. Which, by the way, is fine with me. > > What is not so fine is trying to cling to the Struts name because of its > value as a brand, even though the software is completely different. > > If you are now interested in JSF, more power to you, just let go of the > Struts name. If the other committers think that WebWork is much > better, they should join the WebWork project and leave the reins of > the Struts project with someone else. > > Names that confuse are not very useful. > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
