On 4/18/06, Eric Rank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I agree that the manual validation approach is very good at keeping > related code in one place. This is how I'm currently choosing to solve > this problem. > > However, I feel that it's sloppy because it requires additional logic. > I try to avoid using unecessary logic for the sake of keeping code > readable. When I have a bunch of nested logic to sift through, it > doesn't take more than 3 levels before I begin to lose my place in my > own neural memory stack. Suddenly, 'execute' starts doing too much. > > In my mind, optionally implementing an interface / method designed to > run when the form validation fails seems very elegant to me. The code > is much more compartmentalized.
In my mind, the code is readable when I can read what it's doing. With validate="true" I cannot. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
