NP 2006/5/4, Ed Griebel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Great link, thanks!! -ed On 5/3/06, Jakub Milkiewicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi > I think JMS is only valid , i.e. following specification solution. > Take a look at: > http://www.javaranch.com/newsletter/200403/AsynchronousProcessingFromServlets.html > > 2006/5/3, Dave Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > Ed Griebel wrote: > > > The tricky part is that you can't create a new thread in your action > > > as it violates the servlet spec (as you don't know what thread will > > > get subsequent requests from the same session, so you've lost the > > > handle to your child thread), > > > > Oh, yeah? Is that equally valid for a servlet that's run only on > > initialization that starts a thread that thrashes through the database > > every now and then doing something? I know I could use jCrontab/etc. but > > they're already mad enough at me for using not-invented-here stuff >:-( > > > > Dave > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
