-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Mark,
Mark Menard wrote: > On 11/30/06 7:45 PM, "Christopher Schultz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: >> Sorry for poking my nose in, but wouldn't this be horrendously >> non-threadsafe? > > No problem. If your thinking of Actions from the perspective of S1, yes, > this would be horribly non-thread safe. In S2 an action instance is created > for each request. They are not singletons. So, this is fine. Yup, I was thinking of S1 actions, so thanks for setting me straight. Once of these days I've got to read "everything you ever wanted to know about moving from S1 to S2". Anyhow know if such a thing exists? ;) Thanks, - -chris -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFcDoz9CaO5/Lv0PARAqZ2AJ0fdk6nH//QlwIiOvk4ghEozrKj4QCgrWWd eMf3FFWwefGTHrp+4F7GKH0= =KTr3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
