This is not a bug per se. The xhtml theme extends the simple theme. If a template doesn't exist in the xhtml theme it will fall back the simple theme. From a performance perspective, you simple need to copy the simple theme hidden.ftl to the xhtml directory. This will allow freemarker to cache it properly.
On 2/27/07, Shuai Zheng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sorry to disturb again. This issue is because default the s:hidden tag will use xhtml as theme, but actually in the distribution, there is no template/xhtml/hidden.ftl. It always get from template/simple/hidden.ftl. But the cache does not know it. Then this template is recompiled again and again. Will report it to JIRA. A bad news for me, just know my target .net project response time is around 0.3 second. Any suggestion to improve the speed? If I use apache work with tomcat or any web server, can I get faster speed? Regards, Zheng Shuai On 2/27/07, Shuai Zheng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > One more thing, this only happens on template/xhtml/hidden.ftl. > > Should I report this as a bug? > > On 2/27/07, Shuai Zheng < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Dear All, > > > > Still do research on the debug log and try to get performance > > improvement, because I try to beat another .net system on speed(it can shows > > all the pages in 0.5 second,sigh). > > > > One more thing I just find out, if the log does not cheat me:) > > > > Although I have enabled the property template_update_delay=60000 in > > freemarker.properties and also move the template out the jar file. > > So there are a lot of log like: > > "[freemarker.cache]http-8080-Processor24 > > template/xhtml/select.ftl[en_GB,UTF-8,parsed] cached copy not yet stale; > > using cached." > > So it looks correct. But also, there are something like followings: > > > > "Could not find template in cache, creating new one; > > id=[template/xhtml/hidden.ftl[en_GB,UTF-8,parsed]" > > "template/simple/hidden.ftl[en_GB,UTF-8,parsed] cached copy not yet > > stale; using cached." > > Above logs occur in the log again and again. I don't know what happened > > actually but it shows the hidden.ftl is not cached at all (how can this > > happens? when some others are cached?) > > > > Regards, > > > > Zheng Shuai > > > > > > On 2/26/07, Vlad2006 < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi Zheng, > > > > > > Have you profiled your application? Are you sure it is OGNL that makes > > > your > > > application slow? > > > > > > From my experience it is not so slow. At least I have not found it too > > > be a > > > bottleneck in my application. Not yet :-). > > > > > > What is really slow in WebWork/Struts2 is jsp tags like, textfield, > > > radio, > > > anchor, and other which are using FreeMarker templates. > > > > > > If it is your case, you could make it faster, you have to extract > > > templates > > > out of webwork.jar (in your case probably struts.jar) and put them in, > > > for > > > example, WEB-INF/templates directory. > > > There is a page on WebWork Wiki about it: > > > http://wiki.opensymphony.com/display/WW/Performance+Tuning > > > > > > I am not using Struts2 yet, but I believe most of the tips will work > > > for > > > Struts2. > > > > > > One more thing that could make application slower is when resource > > > bundles > > > are constantly reloaded. It is good for dev but not acceptable for > > > production. Check in struts property like: webwork.i18n.reload=false > > > > > > > > > Best regards > > > Vlad > > > > > > > > > > > > Shuai Zheng wrote: > > > > > > > > Dear All, > > > > > > > > I am using struts 2.0.6, but honestly the performance is very bad > > > (not > > > > need > > > > to think about scalability), to speed to load a simple page is much > > > slower > > > > than pure JSP (I haven't compared with struts 1). To refresh one > > > page it > > > > is > > > > 3-5 seconds with only one user. The profiler tells me the OGNL is > > > the > > > > bottleneck. > > > > > > > > I notice that there are some complains on OGNL about the performance > > > > already, may I know any other way to replace OGNL with anything else > > > to > > > > get > > > > a faster speed? Currently the speed is not acceptable for > > > production. > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > Zheng Shuai > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > View this message in context: > > > http://www.nabble.com/The-performance-issue-about-OGNL-tf3291137.html#a9157447 > > > Sent from the Struts - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > >
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
