On 4/24/07 8:49 AM, "Shahak Nagiel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Others can chime in as well, but from my experience in the past,
> container-managed authentication is a little too rigid and doesn't offer
> anywhere near the flexibility of a custom-brewed authentication/authorization
> scheme.  That's not to say a "custom" scheme need be entirely proprietary; we
> just implemented a JAAS-backed security framework for authentication and
> authorization, but which fully exposes in our source code (action classes and
> authorization interceptor) all steps of the process so we have control over
> things that container-managed security makes difficult (such as logging,
> counting of failed logins, integrating authorization rules into struts.xml,
> and so forth).

I'd echo a lot of this sentiment. Using the interceptor gives me control
over the process. Also, personally I don't use JAAS. Maybe I will someday,
but right now I don't.

Mark

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to