That looks right to me :)
musachy
On 6/20/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
<!-- Actions -->
<bean id="pufAction" class="actions.PayrollUpdateAction"
scope="prototype" >
<property name="payrollUpdate" ref="anUpdate"/>
</bean>
<!-- Add actions here -->
<action name="PayrollUpdate_*" method="{1}" class="pufAction">
<result name="input">PayrollUpdate</result>
<result name="list">PayrollUpdate_list</result>
<result name="add">PayrollUpdate</result>
<result name="show">PayrollUpdate</result>
<result name="edit">PayrollUpdate</result>
<result name="destroy">PayrollUpdate</result>
<result name="notes"
type="chain">PayrollUpdateNotes_list</result>
</action>
On 6/20/07, Musachy Barroso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> That should be it, and scope=prototype has always done the trick for
me,
> why don't you post relevant parts of the spring conf file?
>
> regards
> musachy
>
> On 6/20/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Oooop! The struts.xml change did not force the context to
reload! Now
> > that
> > I have changed the class in the action mapping to the fully qualified
> > class
> > name, it *is* being instantiated on each request! So why is it not
> > working
> > with the Spring bean id?
> >
> > On 6/20/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > I replaced the spring bean id in my action mapping with the fully
> > > qualified class name to rule Spring out completely. I am still
never
> > seeing
> > > the log4j output in the constructor of my action class! I have
double
> > > checked my log4j.properties and the debug output would be written
out
> if
> > > the constructor were called.
> > >
> > > Any ideas? Could this have anything to do with an interceptor?
> > >
> > > On 6/20/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I'm using Spring 2.x and the attribute scope="prototype"
> > > >
> > > > On 6/19/07, Zarar Siddiqi < [EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > It sounds to me like your Action class might be configured as a
> > > > > singleton.
> > > > > If that's the case the action class' constructor would only be
> > called
> > > > > once
> > > > > on startup. Make sure you have singleton="false" in your Spring
> > > > > config for
> > > > > the action class. The default value for singleton is true.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > stanlick wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > It appears as though I am not getting a new Action instance
> > created
> > > > > for
> > > > > > each
> > > > > > request! I have placed a logging statement in the constructor
> of
> > my
> > > > > > Action
> > > > > > class and it is not emitting output. The Bean inside the
Action
> > > > > *is*
> > > > > > emitting log statements from its constructor so I must have
the
> > > > > Spring
> > > > > > beans
> > > > > > wired correctly. I am injecting both the Actions and Action
> Beans
> > > > > via
> > > > > > Spring. I have scope=prototype on them both.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Any ideas?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > Scott
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > View this message in context:
> > > > >
> >
>
http://www.nabble.com/Spring-Action-Instantiation-tf3948840.html#a11205652
> > > > > Sent from the Struts - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Scott
> > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Scott
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Scott
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>
>
>
> --
> "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
>
--
Scott
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
"Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
