Frank, would you care to give the same tests a shot with ognl 2.7 and javassist in the mix.
Although none of this is purely scientific, at least evaluations on that regard give us some level of subjective information. The ognl 2.7 and javassist jar are available via the tapestry-4.2-libs download : http://tapestry.apache.org/download.html Frank W. Zammetti wrote: > > Dunno if this might help, but: > > http://www.omnytex.com/struts_benchmarking.zip > > In it you'll find two applications, one for S1 (1.3.8) and one for S2 > (2.0.8)... they are both (I think!) pretty much equivalent, and about as > simplistic as you can get. Also included is a JMeter test plan to run > against them (just disable one or the other thread group, wouldn't want > to test them both at the same time!). > > Just ran a quick-and-dirty comparison of the two using the test plan... > I ran 100 users with no ramp-up... local Tomcat instance (6.0.13)... the > one difference is that the S1 version was compiled with JDK 1.4.2, and > the S2 version with 1.6.0, so there's at least one potentially big > variance right up front... here's what I saw: > > S1 results: > 4256 samples, 913 average, 108.6/sec throughput, 16.01 KB/sec > > S2 results: > 4165 samples, 1974 average, 50.0/sec throughput, 7.38 KB/sec > > I'm not claiming this to be the perfect test, nor do I believe there's > not some flaws in there (benchmarking is always a tough thing to get > quite right, especially trying to do a comparison like this)... but, > unless someone can point out some obvious mistakes I made, the numbers > don't lie: S2 *looks*, *on the surface* at least, to be inherently twice > as slow as S1. > > I'm not trying to make any sensational claims here, and again, I may > have totally blown it in the first place (I did throw this together in > about 30 minutes after all), but if we can use this as a basis going > forward, maybe build it up as a more expansive, realistic and solid > benchmarking suite, then it's all good in the end. > > Anyway, it's there, if anyone's interested. > > Frank > > -- > Frank W. Zammetti > Founder and Chief Software Architect > Omnytex Technologies > http://www.omnytex.com > AIM/Yahoo: fzammetti > MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Author of "Practical Ajax Projects With Java Technology" > (2006, Apress, ISBN 1-59059-695-1) > and "JavaScript, DOM Scripting and Ajax Projects" > (2007, Apress, ISBN 1-59059-816-4) > Java Web Parts - http://javawebparts.sourceforge.net > Supplying the wheel, so you don't have to reinvent it! > > Ing. Andrea Vettori wrote: >> >> Il giorno 12/lug/07, alle ore 16:31, Guillaume Carré ha scritto: >> >>> 2007/7/12, Ing. Andrea Vettori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >>>> Compared to nothing... they are pure numbers. They are simply just >>>> good enought (to me). >>>> >>>> If we don't have this in mind we should use assember for everything :) >>> >>> what I meant was: maybe it could be a good idea to redevelop your >>> screens with, say struts 1 for example, and compare the results >> >> mmmm I can't do that... simply don't have the time... :) >> >> >>>> In the high load test, after 10 seconds you have about 90 users (the >>>> other 10 should have finished). Having a response time of 2,5 seconds >>>> for a db search and result display under such load seems very good to >>>> me. >>>> >>>> Don't you ? >>> >>> it depends :-) >>> >>> "2.5s" doesn't say much to me, I would need to know how much time is >>> consumed in your DB requests, how much time is consumed in your >>> service layer, etc etc. >>> >>> Is it 90 users really active at the same time, meaning using 90 >>> threads on the server?if it is, do you have at least 90 connections in >>> your pool? >>> or did you put think times in your tests? >> >> >> >> No think time... >> >> I have 250 threads but I have a limit of 50 connections on my pool. I'll >> try to raise >> the number of maximum connection to see if the MP3 list test gets better. >> >> However I think that struts alone is performing well for my app; don't >> know if it's because >> i'm using only few OGNL expressions on my jsp pages. >> >> -- >> Ing. Andrea Vettori >> Consulente per l'Information Technology >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> >> >> >> >> --No virus found in this incoming message. >> Checked by AVG Free Edition.Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: >> 269.10.4/897 - Release Date: 7/11/2007 9:57 PM >> >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Struts-2-performance-tf4053401.html#a11568260 Sent from the Struts - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
