Well, looking at my code using Validations on methods, I noticed that I used it only on one method and used @SkipValidation on my other action methods (which worked). So I did not try the multi validations scenario.
Just to test, let the validations annotation on only one method and check what happens. -----Message d'origine----- De : beto [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Envoyé : vendredi 10 août 2007 13:21 À : user@struts.apache.org Objet : RE: S2 : Validation per Action method - ideas? Yes, I removed the annotations from the setters. I might be overlooking something, but I'm not sure where to start looking at this moment. Is there any more details I could provide to help you see the clear picture? Arno wrote: > > Pretty strange indeed. Did you remove all the validation annotations on > the > field setters? > > -----Message d'origine----- > De : beto [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Envoyé : vendredi 10 août 2007 11:56 > À : user@struts.apache.org > Objet : RE: S2 : Validation per Action method - ideas? > > > Hi again, and thank you for your answer. > > I've tried using @Validations at the method level as you point out. I'll > try > to illustrate: > > I have an action, not annotated with @Validation, with three action > methods; > input, execute and confirm (custom action method). > > The input method has no annotations and is not validated as expected. > > The execute method is annotated with @Validations: > > @Validations(requiredStrings={ > @RequiredStringValidator(fieldName="amount", > message="Amount is required", key="amount.required") }, regexFields={ > @RegexFieldValidator(fieldName="amount", expression="^\\d+$", > message="Amount has to be numeric", key="amount.numeric") }) > public String execute() throws Exception { > ... > } > > The confirm method is also annotated with @Validations: > > @Validations(expressions={ @ExpressionValidator(expression="confirm == > true", message="test") }) > public String confirm() throws Exception { > ... > } > > And here comes the confusing part. When I call my action with no method > name > indicator (say MyAction, not MyAction_confirm), both fields (amount and > confirm) is validated. I just want to validate "amount" when execute is > called and only the field "confirm" when the confirm method is called. > > What am I doing wrong? > > beto > > > Arno wrote: >> >> This is the Validations (with a 's' at the end :-) ) that can be put on a >> method. The syntax is pretty confusing but the functionality quite neat. >> >> > http://struts.apache.org/2.x/struts2-core/apidocs/com/opensymphony/xwork2/va >> lidator/annotations/Validations.html >> >> -----Message d'origine----- >> De : beto [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Envoyé : vendredi 10 août 2007 10:57 >> À : user@struts.apache.org >> Objet : RE: S2 : Validation per Action method - ideas? >> >> >> Hi. >> >> I've tried using validation annotation (which works great) and ran into >> the >> scenario mentioned by Joseph. I have different action methods which >> requires >> different set of validation rules. I can not find out how to set up >> validation annotation to differentiate the validation rules based on >> which >> action method that is called. I do not wish to use validation xml-files >> if >> I >> can avoid it, and will probably end up creating separate action classes >> in >> these scenarios if not anybody can point out a solution to this problem. >> >> Am I missing something? >> >> Do you have the solution Arno? :-) >> >> >> Arno wrote: >>> >>> You should check the Javadoc of the >>> com.opensymphony.xwork2.validator.annotations.Validation annotation. >>> >>> Syntax example: >>> >>> @Validations( >>> requiredFields = >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED](type = >>> ValidatorType.SIMPLE, >>> fieldName = "customfield", message = "You must enter a value for >>> field.")}, >>> requiredStrings = >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED](type = >>> ValidatorType.SIMPLE, >>> fieldName = "stringisrequired", message = "You must enter a value for >>> string.")} >>> >>> ) >>> public String execute() throws Exception { >>> return SUCCESS; >>> } >>> >>> -----Message d'origine----- >>> De : j alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> Envoyé : jeudi 9 août 2007 15:38 >>> À : Struts Users Mailing List >>> Objet : S2 : Validation per Action method - ideas? >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Is there a way to declaratively restrict validations depending on the >>> method >>> within the Action? - this could be useful for wizard-like forms where >>> each >>> step of the wizard has a set of fields ; corresponds to a different >>> method >>> but all of them share the same Action. >>> >>> I can think of having an expression validator based on currentstep added >>> to >>> every field short-circuited ; but that's more of a workaround rather >>> than >>> the right way to do it. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Joseph >>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> >>> >>> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> > http://www.nabble.com/S2-%3A-Validation-per-Action-method---ideas--tf4242670 >> .html#a12087696 >> Sent from the Struts - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> >> > > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/S2-%3A-Validation-per-Action-method---ideas--tf4242670 > .html#a12088476 > Sent from the Struts - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/S2-%3A-Validation-per-Action-method---ideas--tf4242670 .html#a12089421 Sent from the Struts - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
