I don't understand the use case you are describing, but there has been no development discussions or decisions regarding reducing support for FreeMarker and Velocity. There are several FreeMarker and Velocity examples in the ShowCase, and resources like the CodeBehind Plugin, fully support FTL and VM alongside of JSP.
Of course, to use FTL or VM, we still need to use the appropriate result types, but I believe the same is true of WebWork. -Ted. On 9/6/07, Leonidas Papadakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi there, > > i used to have the following scenario in webwork . A file header.shtml > and footer.shtml . The "shtml" was set as the default velocity > extension. I used to be able to add the velocity servlet to web.xml (can > not do now ...) so the file was parsed as velocity. Now : > 1) direct access to velocity or freemarker files does not parse the > files but displays them as text > 2) can not have a <jsp:include page="header.shtml" /> on my jsp result > file. The header file is not parsed and i am getting wrong output. > > So i guess that i have to change everything to jsp, since even if i have > a freemarker file <jsp:include page="header.ftl" /> this will not be > parsed .... > > I think there should be a way , so that i will not lose the "freedom" of > webwork ... > > I appreciate your replies. > > Best Regards > > Leonidas --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
