If you need to share data between the servlet and the portlet, you
have to put it in the application scope, using the
PortletSession.APPLICATION_SCOPE constant in the setAttribute
operation.

Nils-H

On 10/31/07, Miguel Ping <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am already using the plugin :) Nice work, by the way ;)
>
> I'm having some issue sharing data between portlet sessions and servlet
> sessions... The portlet api says that the data in servlet session must be
> acessible from the portlet session. But if i put something in the session
> map by means of the SessionAware interface, when I'm in the GWT actions, the
> data is not acessible. Am I doing something wrong?
>
> On 10/31/07, Musachy Barroso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > not sure if you can use it for this, but there is a GWT plugin for struts:
> >
> > http://cwiki.apache.org/S2PLUGINS/gwt-plugin.html
> >
> > musachy
> >
> > On 10/31/07, Miguel Ping <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hi, thanks for the answer. Yes you are correct, GWT makes special
> > requests
> > > that update a part of a page. I am reading the Portlet spec and I didn't
> > > knew that portlets had custom urls, thanks for the pointer :)
> > >
> > > So I guess in order to have access to portlet preferences / principal
> > info /
> > > etc, the best is to store them in the http session.
> > > Is it an option to write a custom GWT request that passes as a regular
> > > portlet url, so the dispatcher can process it? I understand that this is
> > not
> > > directly related to struts, I just want to be sure that the
> > > Jsr168RequestDispatcher works by inspecting urls...
> > >
> > >
> > > On 10/31/07, Nils-Helge Garli Hegvik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi!
> > > >
> > > > The Jsr168Dispatcher only handles requests created as Portlet URLs.
> > > > I'm not familiar with GWT so apoligies if my assumptions are
> > > > incorrect, but I assume that you're referring to some sort of "partial
> > > > request" that updates a section of the page? In that case, it's
> > > > correct that it should be invoked as a servlet request, since invoking
> > > > it through a portlet url will change the state and corrupt your entire
> > > > portlet (you would get the contents of the entire portal page from the
> > > > request). So I would recommend that you build your application so that
> > > > the AJAX part is working as a servlet.
> > > >
> > > > The Portlet 2.0 specification has better support for this kind of
> > > > stuff, so it will improve in the future :)
> > > >
> > > > Nils-H
> > > >
> > > > On 10/31/07, Miguel Ping <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > Hi all, this is my first post to struts2 mailing list :)
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm using Struts2 and the gwt plugin by Musachy Barroso, in a
> > portlet
> > > > > project, and for the front end I'm using Google Web Toolkit (gwt).
> > So
> > > > I'm
> > > > > using struts only for the actions, except for the 'default' action,
> > > > which is
> > > > > a jsp with struts taglibs.
> > > > >
> > > > > In my portlet project, I have an action that implements the
> > > > PrincipalAware
> > > > > interface, that is the default action for my portlet. This action
> > calls
> > > > the
> > > > > jsp. When I debug this action, I can see that the PrincipalProxy
> > object
> > > > is a
> > > > > portlet proxy object; however all gwt calls to struts2 actions that
> > > > > implement the PrincipalAware interface gives me only Serlver proxy
> > > > objects.
> > > > > I think that this happens because GWT calls the action directly,
> > > > bypassing
> > > > > the Jsr168Dispatcher. The action then 'thinks' that the request is a
> > > > servlet
> > > > > request instead of a portlet request.
> > > > >
> > > > > My question is: how can I force all requests to pass by the Jsr168
> > > > request
> > > > > dispatcher? I want to have access of portlet data in my actions,
> > through
> > > > GWT
> > > > > calls.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks In advance,
> > > > > Miguel Ping
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to