That would be the first thing I would do and generate a serialVersionUID for
the pojo.

Regards,
Randy Burgess
Sr. Web Applications Developer
Nuvox Communications



> From: Brian Relph <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: Struts Users Mailing List <user@struts.apache.org>
> Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 10:38:28 -0600
> To: Struts Users Mailing List <user@struts.apache.org>
> Subject: serializable and exceptions
> 
> Hey everyone, I seem to be coming across two issues when running multiple
> jvms with session sharing ... i have not run into this during my previous
> testing, since i was not worried about a high-availability environment, and
> did not test inside a cluster...
> 
> Anyways, i receive this exception when using the ModelDriven interface (the
> Accounts object is my model):
> 
> [2/14/08 3:35:04:737 GMT] 00000052 HttpSessDRSBu E storeObject: Caught
> Exception while trying to serialize. Stack trace:
> java.io.NotSerializableException:
> com.cerner.healthe.admin.portlet.model.Accounts
> I did not really investigate how the ModelDriven interface works, it just
> made my ui code cleaner, and allowed me to group a bunch of fields outside
> of my action.  Anyways, i was wondering if changing the ModelDriven
> interface to require the object to implement Serializable would make sense?
> 
> Because of this serializable exception, my exception interceptor forwards me
> to a page, and then i display the exception.  At this point, i get another
> similar exception:
> 
> [2/14/08 16:16:48:936 GMT] 00000029 HttpSessDRSBu E   storeObject: Caught
> Exception while trying to serialize. Stack trace:
> java.io.NotSerializableException:
> com.opensymphony.xwork2.interceptor.ExceptionHolder
> 
> I see that the xwork2 interceptor implement the Serializable interface, but
> that particular class does not.  Is xwork2 code part of the struts2 code
> base, i.e., is this the right place to post for these exceptions?
> 
> Finally (this kinda has a bunch of things all wrapped into one), is there
> any easier way to increase the logging of the exception interceptor,
> besides re-defining the default interceptor stack?  I tried to just
> re-define the interceptor, i also tried to just set the parameters, but
> it did not seem to work unless i configured my own stack in this way:
> 
> <interceptors>
> 
> <interceptor-stack name="defaultLoggingStack">
>   <interceptor-ref name="exception">
>     <param name="logEnabled">true</param>
>     <param name="logLevel">warn</param>
>   </interceptor-ref>
>   <interceptor-ref name="alias" />
>   <interceptor-ref name="servlet-config" />
>   <interceptor-ref name="prepare" />
>   <interceptor-ref name="i18n" />
>   <interceptor-ref name="chain" />
>   <interceptor-ref name="debugging" />
>   <interceptor-ref name="profiling" />
>   <interceptor-ref name="scoped-model-driven" />
>   <interceptor-ref name="model-driven" />
>   <interceptor-ref name="fileUpload" />
>   <interceptor-ref name="checkbox" />
>   <interceptor-ref name="static-params" />
>   <interceptor-ref name="params" />
>   <interceptor-ref name="conversionError" />
>   <interceptor-ref name="validation">
>     <param name="excludeMethods">
>       input,back,cancel,browse
>     </param>
>   </interceptor-ref>
>   <interceptor-ref name="workflow">
>     <param name="excludeMethods">
>       input,back,cancel,browse
>     </param>
>   </interceptor-ref>
> </interceptor-stack>
> 
> <!-- Default stack for operating in portlet environment -->
> <interceptor-stack name="portletDefaultLoggingStack">
>   <interceptor-ref name="portletState" />
>   <interceptor-ref name="defaultLoggingStack" />
>   <interceptor-ref name="portletAware" />
> </interceptor-stack>
> 
> </interceptors>
> -- 
> Brian



This email and any attachments ("Message") may contain legally privileged 
and/or confidential information.  If you are not the addressee, or if this 
Message has been addressed to you in error, you are not authorized to read, 
copy, or distribute it, and we ask that you please delete it (including all 
copies) and notify the sender by return email.  Delivery of this Message to any 
person other than the intended recipient(s) shall not be deemed a waiver of 
confidentiality and/or a privilege.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to