>> I was under the impression that I could write actions without extending >> ActionSupport or implementing any struts2/xwork interfaces.
>You can. Doesn't mean you'd *want* to, if you want to use functionality >provided by the framework. I want to do this so that I can minimize the coupling between my actions and struts2. JSF permits this. You still have to call a static method to add validation errors messages from actions, but at least you don't have to extend a class or implement an interface. I was hoping struts2 had a similar approach. >You don't *need* to extend ActionSupport to implement ValidationAware, it's >just much easier. So I *must* implement an interface (ValidationAware) or extend a struts2 class in order to add errors messages from an action. Is that accurate? thanks very much, tom -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Actions-without-extending-ActionSupport--tp15591064p15593697.html Sent from the Struts - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
