After some searching I found: http://lazutkin.com/blog/2007/feb/1/improving-performance/
Under ' Optimizing widget initialization' there is an explantion on what to set (parseWidgets) and how to create them in code. I realized I am using version 2.0.8 and me IDE says that parseContent is not a valid attribute for the s:head. What release was that attribure introduced? Thank you, Rich On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 11:49 AM, Dave Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Doesn't <s:head...> have a parseContent attribute? > > Either way, you may just be able to replicate the <s:head...> generated code > with your own. > > Dave > > --- On Mon, 6/9/08, Richard Sayre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> From: Richard Sayre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Subject: Re: Struts 2 Performance >> To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <user@struts.apache.org> >> Date: Monday, June 9, 2008, 10:53 AM >> Thank you for the dojo info. I did a custom build for dojo >> using >> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/S2WIKI/Creating+a+custom+Dojo+profile+for+Struts+2.0.x >> and it reduced alot of requests >> >> I would like to turn off the page scan that dojo does and >> add the >> bootstrap code for the widgits my self. I'm not sure >> what to search >> for to find information on this. Can you point me to any >> articles or >> documentation? >> >> Thank you, >> >> Rich >> >> >> On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 5:05 PM, Laurie Harper >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > Richard Sayre wrote: >> >> >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> I have a few questions regarding performance in >> Struts 2. >> >> >> >> First of all we are using 2.0.9. I am trying to >> get the source to fix >> >> the following memory leaks : >> >> https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-2167 >> but I can't find the >> >> 2.0.9 build. Can anyone point me to the source >> for that build? >> > >> > >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/struts/struts2/tags/STRUTS_2_0_9/ >> > >> >> We have several Struts 2 applications hosted on a >> Tomcat server. We >> >> have a copy of our Struts libraries in each of the >> applications >> >> WEB-INF folder. Is there a better way to have >> this set up to save >> >> memory? I know this is more of a tomcat question >> but I figured some >> >> one here might have some suggestions. >> > >> > As Giovanni said, you can put the struts jars (and >> dependencies) into a >> > shared lib folder. You don't need to introduce >> Tomcat instancing to do this, >> > though. I should also point out that this isn't a >> tested configuration, so >> > you will want to test thoroughly. >> > >> >> Also, when I run Firebug to check the loading time >> of my page it seems >> >> that alot of time is spent downloading Dojo >> scripts. I am only using >> >> the Ajax and the Tabbed Panel provided by dojo, >> nothing else. Is >> >> there a way to configure dojo to only use what is >> nessessary? I did >> >> see a post on this list a while ago that involved >> extracting the files >> >> and rewriting the dojo require file, is this >> still the best way to >> >> increase dojo performance? >> > >> > Yes; you can improve the Dojo multiple-http-requests >> issue by creating a >> > custom Dojo build, which will bundle everything you >> use into dojo.js. You >> > will then see only one request (for dojo.js) in place >> of the multiple >> > requests you have now. See the Dojo documentation for >> how to create a custom >> > profile/build, or see below. >> > >> >> I was also getting a "script is busy - cancel >> or continue" in IE and >> >> Firefox. This was on a page that has a alot of >> HTML divs. I finally >> >> narrowed it down to some dojo that was running >> that seemed to be >> >> looping through every element on the page after it >> loaded. Does >> >> anyone have any insight into this behavior? Why >> is it needed? >> > >> > By default, Dojo scans the entire page looking for >> widgets to instantiate >> > (i.e. looking for tags with a dojoType attribute). For >> pages with a lot of >> > markup, that can be quite costly. There's a Dojo >> configuration switch to >> > turn that off, but then you need to add code to >> bootstrap the widgets. >> > >> >> Does the latest version 2.0.11.1 use a different >> version of dojo? >> >> Does it perform better? Would there be alot of >> code changes to change >> >> from 0.4 to the version that the current build >> uses? >> > >> > 2.0.11.1 doesn't offer much improvement, but 2.1.2 >> (beta) does. 2.1.2 comes >> > with a custom Dojo build pre-baked and with widget >> scanning turned off (it >> > also handles the widget bootstrapping for you). >> It's certainly more work to >> > upgrade to 2.1.2 than 2.0.11.1 but, given your >> concerns, it is probably >> > worth it. >> > >> > L. >> > >> > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > For additional commands, e-mail: >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > >> > >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
