newton.dave wrote: > > http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/writing-interceptors.html > > The result has already been rendered after the invoke, so header > modification would be a bit superfluous ;) >
I guess I'm going about this the wrong way. I want the other developers on the team to be able to write actions without worrying about adding in code to support the in-house framework, so an interceptor that could execute after the action seemed like a fit - except that it can't modify the request. So is there a better approach that could still keep my actions clean? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/adding-a-header-in-a-struts-2-interceptor-tp17808069p17824519.html Sent from the Struts - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
