markbeek wrote:
Can anyone (a) confirm this analysis of the source code, and (b) if so, explain why the decision was made to consider zero an invalid entry for a double property on a form field?
I believe it was probably what's conventionally known as a "mistake". It appears to have been resolved with XW-677. Dave --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
