Struts adds overhead for serving static content. Not that I have ever done any benchmarking on it, but I know that at my company(large online retailer), just suggesting to serve static content thru tomcat instead of apache is a big offense.
musachy On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 8:25 AM, rtd<r...@mailinator.com> wrote: > > > Musachy Barroso wrote: >> >> serving static content with struts 2 is probably not a good idea >> (performance and security wise) >> > Can you expand upon that thought? At first blush, it strikes me as an > over-generalization, but I'm always interested in learning. > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/Struts2-static-content-tp19784601p24167321.html > Sent from the Struts - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@struts.apache.org > > -- "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@struts.apache.org
