-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 All,
Bump: does anyone have any ideas? Thanks, - -chris On 4/12/2010 4:48 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote: > All, > > It's been a long time since I've posted, and I've got my eye on S2 for > some upcoming work that will share code with a non-web-based interface > so I'd like to re-use as much code as possible without tying myself to > the S2 API. > > The issue is with field validation: I'd love to use an action which has > fields, etc. and possibly even a validate() method but I'd like to avoid > having a dependency on the S2 API. Is this possible? > > I've been reading "Struts 2 in Action" which has a chapter on validation > (the "real" kind where you specify the validation separate from the code > rather than hard-coding it) but it looks like you have to at least > implement ValidationAware, which ties me to the S2 API (well, xwork, but > whatever...). > > I'm wondering if it's a possibility to, say, put something on the > ValueStack that implements this interface /other/ than the Action itself > or something like that? > > Any ideas or best practices anyone could suggest? > > Thanks, > -chris - --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@struts.apache.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkvV/noACgkQ9CaO5/Lv0PBPngCgrusPiyNQg9auIAyHITR+/3+Q VSAAoKXhwC16xltYpBNciBU9Xogc05r5 =SYYs -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@struts.apache.org
