Why not to name your original page page-input.jsp?

On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 10:31 PM, Greg Akins <angryg...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Does that mean that I can't use the Convention plugin if I want the
> Validation Interceptor to behave like I'm expecting?
>
> It seems like the information I've read so far implies that the
> Validator Interceptor will allow the "submitting" page to appear with
> the information filled in and the error messages displaying where
> appropriate.  But if I follow the Convention plugin and use it's
> action/results then I don't get the same behavior.
>
> Am I missing something, or is this correct.
>
> On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 3:06 PM, Gena Ganebnyi <gganeb...@nebulent.com>
> wrote:
> > When validation fails, intercept returns "INPUT" on behalf of the action.
> > That is why convention plugin takes you to page-input.jsp
> >
> > On Nov 16, 2010 9:06 PM, "Greg Akins" <angryg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> I'm trying to get validation working.. should be pretty simple.
> >>
> >> It looks like if my validation fails Struts should auto-magically take
> >> me back to the originating jsp. Instead Struts keeps wanting to find
> >> a page-INPUT.jsp to match the INPUT return type.
> >>
> >> I'm using the convention plugin and using annotations, rather than
> >> validator.xml, for validations. Struts 2.2.1. There is no struts.xml
> >> file in the project (everything is through annotations.).
> >>
> >> Any hints?
> >>
> >> --
> >> Greg Akins
> >>
> >> http://insomnia-consulting.org
> >> http://www.pghcodingdojo.org
> >> http://pittjug.dev.java.net
> >> http://twitter.com/akinsgre
> >> http://www.linkedin.com/in/akinsgre
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@struts.apache.org
> >>
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Greg Akins
>
> http://insomnia-consulting.org
> http://www.pghcodingdojo.org
> http://pittjug.dev.java.net
> http://twitter.com/akinsgre
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/akinsgre
>

Reply via email to