I'm pretty sure javascript can't get the file path in modern browsers, only
the name.
  (*Chris*)

On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 11:22 AM, Jason Pyeron <jpye...@pdinc.us> wrote:

> Why don't you try to do your validation as AJAX, so you never submit the
> page
> until it does have the correct "filename/path"?
>
> (I am assuming that javascript can read the filename/path attribute, just
> not
> set it; test with an onclick:alert(property...) )
>
> The remainder is up to you to figure out how to write your javascript, or
> hire a
> consultant to do it for you. If you are looking for people on the cheap (I
> am
> not cheap) google for freelancer type sites.
>
> --
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> -                                                               -
> - Jason Pyeron                      PD Inc. http://www.pdinc.us
> <http://www.pdinc.us/>  -
> - Principal Consultant              10 West 24th Street #100    -
> - +1 (443) 269-1555 x333            Baltimore, Maryland 21218   -
> -                                                               -
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> This message is copyright PD Inc, subject to license 20080407P00.
>
>
>
>
>   _____
>
> From: vivek mishra [mailto:mishravive...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Saturday, May 21, 2011 5:05
> To: Struts Users Mailing List
> Subject: Re: Unable to add value in <html:file>
>
>
> Yeh exactly it's my ownership ... I was trying to find out if could acheive
> this
> using struts functionality.. Though I have a solution for this requirement
> already but that would be a hacky way.
>
> Many Thanks for your help ..:)
>
> Vivek
>
>
> On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 10:26 PM, Dave Newton <davelnew...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>
> I did, I suggested ActiveX, applets, and Flash. It was noted that these
> would need to be signed ("trusted").
>
> The behavior you're seeing is just how browsers work. This is a requirement
> you cannot meet in the same timeframe as your original estimate.
>
> If it were me, I'd do two things:
>
> 1) Take ownership of the oversight (if it was really my oversight,
> otherwise
> whoever agreed to this functionality would need to fess up), and
>
> 2) give the client two choices: pick something else to do during the time
> it'd take to do the applet/etc., r delay something else so you have the
> time
>
>
> Dave
>  On May 20, 2011 11:12 PM, "vivek mishra" <mishravive...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to