Hi, Would you keep WADL*1 in mind when considering alternatives please? Also, when I was 'looking around' a few months back I bumped into a WIP book (http://www.manning.com/davis/) which uses an LDAP implementation*2 as the basis of the registry, so could you keep that in the back of you mind too please?
*1 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_Application_Description_Language *2 http://directory.apache.org/ I watched a google tech talk from a Mr J. Bloch on API design, and his suggested if you can support 3 different providers in a Service Provider Interface than you can be pretty sure you have a high chance of being able to support any variation that may come around :) Regards Wayne On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 12:46 PM, Asankha C. Perera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Paul > > This would be good.. also we could support other Registries than UDDI, and > this could be similar in implementation to the WSDL endpoint > > asankha > > Paul Fremantle wrote: >> >> Ruwan >> >> I believe what Eddie is proposing is to pull the endpoint definition >> from UDDI instead of from WSDL. >> >> So instead of >> >> <endpoint> >> <wsdl...../> >> </endpoint> >> >> You would have >> <endpoint> >> <uddi ....> >> </endpoint> >> >> This would look up the endpoint URL from UDDI. In fact there probably >> would be two options - one is simply to look up the URL in UDDI (using >> a UDDI endpoint definition) and the second is to pull a full WSDL from >> UDDI (http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/webservices/library/ws-wsdl/) >> >> Its been a while since I really studied UDDI, but I guess the main >> thing we should do is to define what the <uddi/> tag needs as input, >> and then once we have that clearly defined, we can code it and test >> against some implementations. >> >> Paul >> >> >> >> >> On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 1:19 PM, Ruwan Linton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> Hi Eddie, >>> >>> >>> Hi there, >>> >>>> >>>> i want to integrate jUDDI and Synapse too. >>>> can i join? >>>> any proposed scope? >>>> >>> >>> For the moment there is no built-in integration with jUDDi, if you need >>> this >>> feature, you may go ahead and file a JIRA for this. >>> >>> http://issues.apache.org/ >>> >>> to me, it will be very useful if it can easily connect to jUDDI as one of >>> >>>> >>>> the endpoint types >>>> >>> >>> What do you mean by endpoint type here, AFAIK jUDDI is a registry right? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Ruwan >>> >>> Eddie Lau >>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> View this message in context: >>>> >>>> http://www.nabble.com/-Synapse-1.1.1--problems-with-XML-request-tp17336164p18176973.html >>>> Sent from the Synapse - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> Ruwan Linton >>> http://wso2.org - "Oxygenating the Web Services Platform" >>> http://ruwansblog.blogspot.com/ >>> >>> >> >> >> >> > > -- > Asankha C. Perera > > WSO2 - http://wso2.org > http://esbmagic.blogspot.com > >
