The JIRA issue for this is https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYNAPSE-393

Thank you,
Laurent.

-----Message d'origine-----
De : Ruwan Linton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Envoyé : lundi 7 juillet 2008 11:34
À : [email protected]
Objet : Re: RE : RE : RE : [Synapse 1.1.1] - F.A.Q. SOAP1.1 to SOAP1.2


Hi Laurent,

I agree, I am in the process of revisiting this code and will fix this when
fixing the earlier issue as well.

Could you please raises a JIRA issue on this.

Thanks,
Ruwan

On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 2:45 PM, Laurent CHARTIER <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Looking in the SVN
> ( 
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/synapse/tags/1.1.1/modules/core/src/main/
> java/
>
org/apache/synapse/core/axis2/SOAPUtils.java?revision=615753&view=markup<htt
p://svn.apache.org/viewvc/synapse/tags/1.1.1/modules/core/src/main/java/org/
apache/synapse/core/axis2/SOAPUtils.java?revision=615753&view=markup>)
> I
> see that only code and reason are obtained from the original SOAPFault to
> create the new SOAP 1.2 SOAPFault.
>
> It would be great to have the role and the detail to be translated too 
> ;-)
>
> Laurent
>
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : Ruwan Linton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Envoyé : samedi 5 juillet 2008 15:24
> À : [email protected]
> Objet : Re: RE : RE : [Synapse 1.1.1] - F.A.Q. SOAP1.1 to SOAP1.2
>
>
> Hi Laurent,
>
> It seems this piece of code is a bit buggy, but I was wondering how 
> this was working when we use the format attribute, may be that also 
> was not properly working.
>
> Let me have a look at all those and get back to you. Sorry for the 
> inconveniences.
>
> Thanks,
> Ruwan
>
> On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 5:17 PM, Laurent CHARTIER < 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hummmm
> > It seems that SOAPUtils.convertSOAP11toSOAP12(...) doesn't convert a 
> > SOAPFault in the Body. I'm testing my mediator and here are the
> > result:
> >
> > Before:
> > <env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/";>
> >        <env:Body>
> >                <env:Fault>
> >                        <faultcode>env:Server</faultcode>
> >                        <faultstring>
> >                                Internal Server Error (Caught 
> > exception while handling
> >                                request: 
> > javax.xml.rpc.JAXRPCException:
> >
> > [fr.cnav.axsas.ProfileUtilisateurHandler.loadProfil()]
> >                                Echec de consultation du Profil 
> > utilisateur dans SAS)
> >                        </faultstring>
> >                </env:Fault>
> >        </env:Body>
> > </env:Envelope>
> >
> > After:
> >
> > <soapenv:Envelope
> >        xmlns:soapenv="http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap-envelope";>
> >        <soapenv:Header />
> >        <soapenv:Body>
> >                <env:Fault
> >
> > xmlns:env="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/";>
> >                        <faultcode>env:Server</faultcode>
> >                        <faultstring>
> >                                Internal Server Error (Caught 
> > exception while handling
> >                                request: 
> > javax.xml.rpc.JAXRPCException:
> >
> > [fr.cnav.axsas.ProfileUtilisateurHandler.loadProfil()]
> >                                Echec de consultation du Profil 
> > utilisateur dans SAS)
> >                        </faultstring>
> >                </env:Fault>
> >        </soapenv:Body>
> > </soapenv:Envelope>
> >
> > Any idea?
> >
> > Laurent.
> >
> >
> > -----Message d'origine-----
> > De : Ruwan Linton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Envoyé : jeudi 3 juillet 2008 17:32
> > À : [email protected]
> > Objet : Re: RE : [Synapse 1.1.1] - F.A.Q. SOAP1.1 to SOAP1.2
> >
> >
> > Hi Laurent,
> >
> > I think the custom mediator will be more performant in this case 
> > because you are using just that utility method. If you use the above 
> > specified steps there will be a filter mediator which will introduce 
> > some overhead which is slightly higher than an if condition when it 
> > comes to execution.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Ruwan
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 8:54 PM, Laurent CHARTIER < 
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > That's what I'm doing into a mediator.
> > > By the way, my synapse.xml won't be difficult to read.
> > >
> > > But what is the most performant? Filtering in a sequence or 
> > > executing a mediator?
> > >
> > > Laurent.
> > >
> > > -----Message d'origine-----
> > > De : Asankha C. Perera [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Envoyé : jeudi 3 juillet 2008 17:18
> > > À : [email protected]
> > > Objet : Re: [Synapse 1.1.1] - F.A.Q. SOAP1.1 to SOAP1.2
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi Laurent
> > >
> > > If I understand your problem correctly, your error handling 
> > > sequence needs to identify a SOAP 1.1 fault and SOAP 1.2 fault 
> > > differently? If so, the easiest is to use a filter mediator and 
> > > check for the existence of a SOAP 1.1 or 1.2 fault element as 
> > > follows:
> > >
> > > <filter source="//s11:Fault" 
> > > xmlns:s11="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/";>
> > >    // this is a SOAP 1.1 fault.. convert to a SOAP 1.2 fault
> > >    <makefault version="soap12">
> > >           <code value="tns:Receiver" 
> > > xmlns:tns="http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap-envelope"/>
> > >           <reason expression="//s11:Reason/s11:Text"/>
> > >   </makefault>
> > > </filter>
> > >
> > > asankha
> > >
> > > Laurent CHARTIER wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > > I have a simple question but I can't get a synapse.xml working.
> > > >
> > > > I have a sequence which sends a WS-request to an endpoint. 
> > > > Actually the format is soap12. If the response is a SOAPFault 
> > > > then the "onError" property points to another sequence which  
> > > > transform the soapFault.
> > > >
> > > > The fact is that this transformation can only be done from a 
> > > > SOAP 1.2 soapFault.
> > > >
> > > > I have to invoque a SOAP 1.1 endpoint. No problem to change the 
> > > > format to soap11 in the address endpoint in order to have a SOAP 
> > > > 1.1 request. But then, if this endpoint returns a soapFault, it 
> > > > is a SOAP 1.1 fault and the transformation can't work.
> > > >
> > > > What can I do before the transformation of a soapFault to be 
> > > > sure the soapFault is a SOAP1.2 fault? And if not, how can I 
> > > > convert from SOAP 1.1 to SOAP 1.2?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Laurent.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Ce message est protégé par les règles relatives au secret des 
> > > > correspondances. Il est donc établi à destination exclusive de 
> > > > son destinataire. Celui-ci peut donc contenir des informations 
> > > > confidentielles. La divulgation de ces informations est à ce 
> > > > titre rigoureusement interdite. Si vous avez reçu ce message par 
> > > > erreur, merci de le renvoyer à l'expéditeur dont l'adresse 
> > > > e-mail figure ci-dessus et de détruire le message ainsi que 
> > > > toute pièce jointe.
> > > >
> > > > This message is protected by the secrecy of correspondence 
> > > > rules. Therefore, this message is intended solely for the 
> > > > attention of the addressee. This message may contain privileged 
> > > > or confidential information, as such the disclosure of these 
> > > > informations is strictly forbidden. If, by mistake, you have 
> > > > received this message, please return this message to the 
> > > > addressser whose e-mail address is written above and destroy 
> > > > this message and all files attached.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Asankha C. Perera
> > >
> > > WSO2 - http://wso2.org
> > > http://esbmagic.blogspot.com
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Ce message est protégé par les règles relatives au secret des 
> > > correspondances. Il est donc établi à destination exclusive de son 
> > > destinataire. Celui-ci peut donc contenir des informations 
> > > confidentielles. La divulgation de ces informations est à ce titre 
> > > rigoureusement interdite. Si vous avez reçu ce message par erreur, 
> > > merci de le renvoyer à l'expéditeur dont l'adresse e-mail figure 
> > > ci-dessus et de détruire le message ainsi que toute pièce jointe.
> > >
> > > This message is protected by the secrecy of correspondence rules. 
> > > Therefore, this message is intended solely for the attention of 
> > > the addressee. This message may contain privileged or confidential 
> > > information, as such the disclosure of these informations is 
> > > strictly forbidden. If, by mistake, you have received this 
> > > message, please return this message to the addressser whose e-mail 
> > > address is written above and destroy this message and all files 
> > > attached.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Ruwan Linton
> > http://wso2.org - "Oxygenating the Web Services Platform" 
> > http://ruwansblog.blogspot.com/
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Ce message est protégé par les règles relatives au secret des 
> > correspondances. Il est donc établi à destination exclusive de son 
> > destinataire. Celui-ci peut donc contenir des informations 
> > confidentielles. La divulgation de ces informations est à ce titre 
> > rigoureusement interdite. Si vous avez reçu ce message par erreur, 
> > merci de le renvoyer à l'expéditeur dont l'adresse e-mail figure 
> > ci-dessus et de détruire le message ainsi que toute pièce jointe.
> >
> > This message is protected by the secrecy of correspondence rules. 
> > Therefore, this message is intended solely for the attention of the 
> > addressee. This message may contain privileged or confidential 
> > information, as such the disclosure of these informations is 
> > strictly forbidden. If, by mistake, you have received this message, 
> > please return this message to the addressser whose e-mail address is 
> > written above and destroy this message and all files attached.
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Ruwan Linton
> http://wso2.org - "Oxygenating the Web Services Platform" 
> http://ruwansblog.blogspot.com/
>
>
>
>
> Ce message est protégé par les règles relatives au secret des 
> correspondances. Il est donc établi à destination exclusive de son 
> destinataire. Celui-ci peut donc contenir des informations 
> confidentielles. La divulgation de ces informations est à ce titre 
> rigoureusement interdite. Si vous avez reçu ce message par erreur, 
> merci de le renvoyer à l'expéditeur dont l'adresse e-mail figure 
> ci-dessus et de détruire le message ainsi que toute pièce jointe.
>
> This message is protected by the secrecy of correspondence rules. 
> Therefore, this message is intended solely for the attention of the 
> addressee. This message may contain privileged or confidential 
> information, as such the disclosure of these informations is strictly 
> forbidden. If, by mistake, you have received this message, please 
> return this message to the addressser whose e-mail address is written 
> above and destroy this message and all files attached.
>
>
>


-- 
Ruwan Linton
http://wso2.org - "Oxygenating the Web Services Platform"
http://ruwansblog.blogspot.com/




Ce message est protégé par les règles relatives au secret des correspondances. 
Il est donc établi à destination exclusive de son destinataire. Celui-ci peut 
donc contenir des informations confidentielles. La divulgation de ces 
informations est à ce titre rigoureusement interdite. Si vous avez reçu ce 
message par erreur, merci de le renvoyer à l'expéditeur dont l'adresse e-mail 
figure ci-dessus et de détruire le message ainsi que toute pièce jointe.

This message is protected by the secrecy of correspondence rules. Therefore, 
this message is intended solely for the attention of the addressee. This 
message may contain privileged or confidential information, as such the 
disclosure of these informations is strictly forbidden. If, by mistake, you 
have received this message, please return this message to the addressser whose 
e-mail address is written above and destroy this message and all files attached.


Reply via email to