Exactly. And documentation will be published to a temporary location.

Andreas

On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 22:18, Keith Bohnenberger
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Ok, and at that point the "completely refactored" mediator would be in the
> nightly build.  Is that correct?
>
>
> On 4/1/09 4:15 PM, "Andreas Veithen" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I was planning to implement the final version of this mediator before
>> next Tuesday. If you can wait a couple of days...
>>
>> Andreas
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 22:05, Keith Bohnenberger
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> For now, would your recommendation be for me to write a custom mediator?
>>>
>>>
>>> On 4/1/09 3:55 PM, "Andreas Veithen" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> It is currently in synapse-experimental. Note that before 1.3 this
>>>> mediator will be completely refactored to support a wider range of use
>>>> cases.
>>>>
>>>> Andreas
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 21:45, Keith Bohnenberger
>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> When is 1.3 coming out?
>>>>> Is the detach mediator in the nightly build?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>
>>>>> Keith
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 4/1/09 3:39 PM, "Asankha C. Perera" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Keith
>>>>>>> I have a xml message coming into the ESB
>>>>>>> The xml messages contains a list of elements that I need to validate.
>>>>>>> If an element in the list fails validation I would like to remove it 
>>>>>>> from
>>>>>>> the list.
>>>>>>> I would then like to send the incoming xml messages minus the elements
>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>> failed validation to the next step in the process.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I've been playing with the iterate and validate mediators and I've 
>>>>>>> looked
>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>> the aggregate mediator but I can't seem to pull it off.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Any suggestions?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> I do not think using the iterate mediator is suitable here, since it
>>>>>> splits the message into multiple. It would be better to use just
>>>>>> validate, and pass the elements to be validated - if thats a well known
>>>>>> list. Then you could remove those which fail using the new detach
>>>>>> mediator which would be available with 1.3..
>>>>>>
>>>>>> cheers
>>>>>> asankha
>>>>>
>>>>> This communication, along with any attachments, is covered by federal and
>>>>> state law governing electronic communications and may contain company
>>>>> proprietary and legally privileged information.
>>>>> If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are 
>>>>> hereby
>>>>> notified that any dissemination, distribution, use or copying of this
>>>>> message
>>>>> is strictly prohibited.
>>>>> If you have received this in error, please reply immediately to the sender
>>>>> and delete this message.  Thank you.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>> This communication, along with any attachments, is covered by federal and
>>> state law governing electronic communications and may contain company
>>> proprietary and legally privileged information.
>>> If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby
>>> notified that any dissemination, distribution, use or copying of this 
>>> message
>>> is strictly prohibited.
>>> If you have received this in error, please reply immediately to the sender
>>> and delete this message.  Thank you.
>>>
>>>
>
> This communication, along with any attachments, is covered by federal and 
> state law governing electronic communications and may contain company 
> proprietary and legally privileged information.
> If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby 
> notified that any dissemination, distribution, use or copying of this message 
> is strictly prohibited.
> If you have received this in error, please reply immediately to the sender 
> and delete this message.  Thank you.
>
>

Reply via email to