Il giorno 14/dic/2012, alle ore 16.58, Denis Signoretto ha scritto: > Hi Fabio, > > I personally don't know Apache Wicket but I would. > Let me check the code, I'll let you know ASAP. > > About creation of new Policies in Configuration Tabs, > do you think we need another issue to avoid creation of a new Global Policy?
Hi Denis, sorry for the delay. I think we can leave the core to check for Global Policy creation validation. I have some time to spend to close this issue. I'm going to fix it. Please, let me have your feedback after the commit. Regards, F. > > Bye, > Denis > -----Messaggio originale----- > Da: Fabio Martelli [mailto:[email protected]] > Inviato: venerdì 14 dicembre 2012 16:44 > A: [email protected] > Oggetto: Re: R: Differences about simple and global password and account > policies > > Hi Denis, > I've seen your issue. > If you are a bit able with Apache Wicket, why don't you try to provide a > patch for the branch? > > Best regards, > F. > > Il giorno 14/dic/2012, alle ore 16.30, Denis Signoretto ha scritto: > >> >> -----Messaggio originale----- >> Da: Fabio Martelli [mailto:[email protected]] >> Inviato: venerdì 14 dicembre 2012 16:26 >> A: [email protected] >> Oggetto: Re: Differences about simple and global password and account >> policies >> >> >> Il giorno 14/dic/2012, alle ore 16.08, Denis Signoretto ha scritto: >> >>> Hi Syncopers, >>> >>> I just read documentation about policies [1] and I need to clarify myself >>> the difference between >>> "Global" and "Simple" policy and the best way to define and use it. >>> >>> After some trials, I can guess that "Global policy" it's unique and applied >>> both to Syncope and to all resources associated with a user. It's right? >>> >>> If 'm right, I'm wondering if going to "Resource > Security" Tab >>> it would be better to hide the Global Password Policy in the selection list. >> >> Hi Denis, >> "Global" policy will be applied always (simply because it exists). >> "Simple" policy will be applied if specified explicitly. Think about a >> password policy associated to a certain resource: it will be evaluated and >> enforced if and only if the user has that resource. >> >> Probably you are right. The Global policy shouldn't be specifiable for >> resource or roles. >> >> and moreover cannot be created new one. Do you agree? >> >> Can you take care to open a new issue for this? >> >> Yes! >> >> What do you think about to integrate this simple info in the wiki >> documantation [1] ? >> >> Regards, >> F. >> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Denis. >>> >>> >>> [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SYNCOPE/Policies >>> >>> >>> Denis Signoretto | Senior Project Manager >>> >>> Intesys - Via Roveggia 122 A - 37136 Verona >>> Tel. 045 503663 | Fax 045 503604 >>> [email protected] >>> www.intesys.it >>> Le informazioni contenute nella presente e-mail e nei suoi allegati >>> potrebbero essere confidenziali/riservate e sono dirette unicamente ai >>> destinatari sopra indicati. In caso di ricezione da parte di persona >>> diversa è vietato qualunque tipo di divulgazione o copia anche parziale. >>> Chi riceva questo messaggio per errore è pregato di inoltrarlo al mittente >>> e di cancellare questa e-mail. >>> >>> This e-mail and its attachments may contain confidential/reserved >>> information and is intended only for the use of the address(es) named >>> above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient of this >>> message, please note that distribution or copying of this communication is >>> forbidden. Anyone who receives this communication in error should return it >>> immediately to the sender and delete the message. >>> >> >
