Hi! how can assign multiple roles to a user? I did a test with syncope, I am able to assign a role to a user, but when I try to assign more than one role I get an error
Down more details.. Best regards, Claudio ------- To test the configuration described in the previous email , we followed the steps below , getting some errors : 1. We tried to create the sample tables directly using the DB H2 tcp://localhost/test: UM_USERS(IDUSER, USERNAME, PASSWORD, ABILITATO) UM_PERMESSI(IDPERMESSO, NOME) UM_PERMESSIUTENTE(ID, IDPERMESSO, IDUTENTE) 2. We have created the following 3 type connectors DatabaseTableConnector that map the tables above: "h2 utenti", "h2 permessi", "h2 utenti_permessi". 3. For each connector we created and associated with one of the following resources: UM_UTENTI Entity Internal mapping types Internal attributes External attributes Mandatory AccountId Password Purpose USER UserId True X BOTH USER Password True X BOTH USER Username USERNAME true BOTH UM_PERMESSI Entity Internal mapping types Internal attributes External attributes Mandatory AccountId Password Purpose ROLE RoleId True X BOTH ROLE RoleName NOME false BOTH UM_PERMESSIUTENTE Entity Internal mapping types Internal attributes External attributes Mandatory AccountId Password Purpose MEMBERSHIP MembershipId True X BOTH USER UserId IDUTENTE true ROLE RoleId IDPERMESSO true BOTH 4. We have created two roles : " ruolo1 " and " ruolo2 ." They have tried to associate the resource UM_PERMESSI , believing that following the creation of a record would be generated in the corresponding table . However, this did not happen , why? 5. Finally, we tried to create a test user by selecting all of the previous resources: UM_UTENTI, UM_PERMESSI, UM_PERMESSIUTENTE Initially we tried to add only ruolo1 . Following this, the tables have been populated correctly. He was later created a new user with both roles " ruolo1 " and " ruolo2 " , but this time occurred the following error: "The method is only for single value attributes". It ' been done something wrong? Should be defined in another way this association ?
