Hello Hyunsik,

could you please delete the last e-mail with the attachement from this mailing 
list? The attachement to this e-mail was not intended to be published here. 
Many thanks.
Sorry for this unnecessary overhead.


Best regards,
Chris



Am 27.09.2014 01:50:44, schrieb Christian Schwabe:

> Hello Hyunsik,
> i send you a private E-Mail because of the content of table columns which 
> should not published.
> > I've probably been looking forward again a bit early, but I'm close to 
> > solve this problem. I'm sure!
> 
> That's what i've tried:
> 
> default> INSERT INTO xxx SELECT * FROM xxxy;> 
> Progress: 0%, response time: 1.819 sec> 
> Progress: 0%, response time: 1.831 sec> 
> Progress: 0%, response time: 2.038 sec> 
> Progress: 0%, response time: 2.445 sec> 
> Progress: 0%, response time: 3.278 sec> 
> Progress: 0%, response time: 4.086 sec> 
> Progress: 1%, response time: 5.106 sec> 
> Progress: 8%, response time: 6.133 sec> 
> Progress: 20%, response time: 7.2 sec> 
> Progress: 22%, response time: 8.279 sec> 
> Progress: 39%, response time: 9.286 sec> 
> Progress: 42%, response time: 10.316 sec> 
> Progress: 50%, response time: 11.357 sec> 
> Progress: 59%, response time: 12.387 sec> 
> Progress: 60%, response time: 13.397 sec> 
> Progress: 67%, response time: 14.422 sec> 
> Progress: 83%, response time: 15.43 sec> 
> Progress: 91%, response time: 16.438 sec> 
> Progress: 98%, response time: 17.446 sec> 
> Progress: 98%, response time: 18.471 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 19.489 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 20.53 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 21.552 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 22.614 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 23.622 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 24.664 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 25.687 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 26.694 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 27.736 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 28.759 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 29.768 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 30.778 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 31.831 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 32.837 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 33.879 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 34.903 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 35.927 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 36.951 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 37.974 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 38.998 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 40.023 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 41.047 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 42.071 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 43.095 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 44.118 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 45.143 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 46.167 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 47.174 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 48.215 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 49.239 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 50.263 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 51.287 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 52.311 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 53.334 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 54.359 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 55.365 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 56.407 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 57.415 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 58.455 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 59.462 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 60.503 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 61.51 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 62.551 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 63.558 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 64.599 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 65.608 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 66.647 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 67.671 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 68.677 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 69.718 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 70.743 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 71.75 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 72.758 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 73.815 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 74.82 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 75.863 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 76.887 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 77.911 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 79.037 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 80.061 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 81.085 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 82.109 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 83.133 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 84.157 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 85.181 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 86.205 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 87.229 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 88.253 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 89.277 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 90.301 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 91.325 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 92.349 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 93.367 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 94.397 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 95.407 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 96.414 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 97.421 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 98.493 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 99.499 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 100.541 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 101.548 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 102.589 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 103.595 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 104.608 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 105.617 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 106.685 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 107.694 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 108.733 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 109.757 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 110.764 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 111.805 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 112.829 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 113.853 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 114.877 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 115.901 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 116.908 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 117.949 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 118.973 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 119.997 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 121.021 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 122.045 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 123.172 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 124.195 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 125.219 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 126.245 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 127.267 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 128.291 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 129.316 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 130.441 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 131.45 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 132.489 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 133.498 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 134.538 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 135.545 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 136.586 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 137.593 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 138.634 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 139.641 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 140.649 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 141.656 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 142.73 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 143.737 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 144.777 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 145.801 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 146.808 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 147.815 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 148.822 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 149.828 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 150.837 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 151.848 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 152.869 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 153.882 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 154.892 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 155.901 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 156.909 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 157.987 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 159.011 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 160.035 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 161.059 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 162.083 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 163.107 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 164.125 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 165.137 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 166.145 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 167.154 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 168.161 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 169.168 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 170.174 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 171.182 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 172.191 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 173.199 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 174.208 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 175.217 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 176.226 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 177.237 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 178.247 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 179.286 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 180.31 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 181.334 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 182.358 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 183.382 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 184.406 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 185.43 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 186.454 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 187.462 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 188.502 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 189.509 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 190.515 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 191.524 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 192.531 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 193.539 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 194.545 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 195.556 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 196.567 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 197.575 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 198.584 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 199.591 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 200.688 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 201.693 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 202.736 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 203.743 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 204.784 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 205.791 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 206.831 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 207.856 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 208.879 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 209.903 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 211.03 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 212.054 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 213.078 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 214.102 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 215.126 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 216.15 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 217.174 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 218.197 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 219.222 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 220.246 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 221.27 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 222.278 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 223.286 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 224.295 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 225.303 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 226.311 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 227.317 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 228.326 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 229.337 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 230.349 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 231.36 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 232.37 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 233.378 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 234.407 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 235.417 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 236.426 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 237.434 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 238.473 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 239.496 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 240.624 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 241.63 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 242.671 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 243.679 sec> 
> Progress: 100%, response time: 244.686 sec> 
> Killed: 9
> Do you know whats happened here?
> 


> 
> Am 26.09.2014 21:31:39, schrieb Hyunsik Choi:
> > Hi Chris,
> > 
> > I got the main cause :)
> > 
> > In my view, the result of netstat is very abnormal because your
> > binding address ip is 127.0.0.1. If so, other machines cannot access
> > your TajoMaster.
> > 
> > Your tajo-site looks valid. So, please check two things:
> >  - All machines use tajo-site.xml that you attached to this mailing list.
> >  - Please ensure restarting your cluster after you set the tajo-site.xml.
> > 
> > Probably, you can fix the problem easily if you check above things.
> > 
> > Have a nice weekend.
> > 
> > - Hyunsik
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 12:12 PM, Christian Schwabe
> > <> > [email protected]> > > wrote:

> > > Hello Hyunsik,
> > > 
> > > TajoMaster on "Master" MacBook seems to run normally. I can't see any
> > > unnormal state.
> > > Attached the log from TajoMaster.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > christians-mbp:bin hduser$ netstat -tn | grep 26003
> > > 
> > > tcp4       0      0  127.0.0.1.26003        127.0.0.1.50262
> > > ESTABLISHED
> > > 
> > > tcp4       0      0  127.0.0.1.50262        127.0.0.1.26003
> > > ESTABLISHED
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Am 26.09.2014 20:22:08, schrieb Hyunsik Choi:
> > > 
> > > I can figure out your environment. :)
> > > 
> > > Could you check TajoMaster log? You need to check if TajoMaster is
> > > running normally.
> > > 
> > > Also, you can ensure that TajoMaster is running by netstat as follows:
> > > 
> > > netstat -tn | grep 26003
> > > 
> > > Thanks,
> > > Hyunsik
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 10:26 AM, Christian Schwabe
> > > <> > > [email protected]> > > ote:
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Hello Hyunsik,
> > > 
> > > no problem. Anyway, thanks for your response.
> > > I have two physical MacBooks here.
> > > Everyone Macbook Pro is configured with the user hduser and the same
> > > password. All Path are the same.
> > > No virtualization for master and slave in use.
> > > 
> > > IP-Address:
> > > -Master :: 192.168.178.101
> > > -Slave :: 192.168.178.39
> > > 
> > > They are currently connected via WLAN but Ethernet is also prepared for
> > > final configuration.
> > > 
> > > Is my configuration in tajo-site.xml need or are these only optional
> > > parameters?
> > > The submitted tajo-site.xml is the config for slave.
> > > 
> > > I don't know exactly what for configuration environments you mean. If any
> > > question is still unanswered feel free to ask.
> > > 
> > > I hope it is still not too late for you and you're reading this e-mail
> > > today.
> > > 
> > > Warm regards,
> > > Chris
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Am 26.09.2014 19:09:19, schrieb Hyunsik Choi:
> > > 
> > > Hi Chris,
> > > 
> > > I'm sorry for late response. It seems to be a network problem because
> > > it's very simple cluster configuration.
> > > 
> > > Q. Could you share your network environment?
> > > 
> > > Q. Is master or slave running on virtual machine?
> > > 
> > > Best regards,
> > > Hyunsik
> > > 
> > > 
> > > On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 9:26 AM, Christian Schwabe
> > > <> > > [email protected]> > > ote:
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Hello guys,
> > > 
> > > my current problem is that the Tajo Worker on Slave couldn't connect to
> > > Master.
> > > i need further/more information about
> > > http://tajo.apache.org/docs/current/configuration/cluster_setup.html#settings
> > > What does these parameters mean?
> > > 
> > > I've attached the worker log from slave where only one worker run.
> > > I've attached the tajo-site.xml from slave.
> > > Is there any setting incorrect?
> > > 
> > > IP-Address:
> > > -Master :: 192.168.178.101
> > > -Slave :: 192.168.178.39
> > > 
> > > Hopefully u can help me.
> > > 
> > > Best regards,
> > > Chris
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Am 26.09.2014 12:56:55, schrieb Christian Schwabe:
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Hello guys,
> > > 
> > > sorry for spamming.
> > > I found the solution.
> > > The path of home directory for Tajo was not the same on both machines.
> > > When I now start Tajo on master in HA mode the worker on the slave machine
> > > starts, too.
> > > BUT in the webUI for the master i didn't see the second worker alive.
> > > 
> > > Warm regards,
> > > Chris
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Am 26.09.2014 12:31:58, schrieb Christian Schwabe:
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Hello guys,
> > > 
> > > next try to get an answer..
> > > Hadoop is still running successfully on both machines master and slave.
> > > Start Tajo in HA mode on master. In webUI i see one Query Master, one 
> > > Worker
> > > and one Masters. Is that correct so far?
> > > Now i start on slave machine the Tajo worker with 'sh tajo-daemon.sh start
> > > worker' and worker starts successfully. Also the conf/masters and
> > > conf/slaves are created on master machine and slave machine
> > > 
> > > However, I see in the WebUI on master no second worker. What is still 
> > > wrong?
> > > Thanks for any advice.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Best regards,
> > > Chris
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Am 23.09.2014 22:58:25, schrieb Christian Schwabe:
> > > 
> > > Hello guys,
> > > 
> > > some days later I already made some progress.
> > > HDFS run already successfully in background. I follow these instructions:
> > > http://www.michael-noll.com/tutorials/running-hadoop-on-ubuntu-linux-single-node-cluster/
> > > 
> > > TajoMasters starts already on HA mode, but how to configure Tajo in detail
> > > to use hdfs? I read this documentation
> > > http://tajo.apache.org/docs/current/configuration/cluster_setup.html,> > 
> > > >  but i
> > > don’t know how to configure tajo to store files to hdfs.
> > > Also i don’t know how to setup the second machine to start only a worker 
> > > and
> > > connect to master.
> > > I already applied masters and workers file.
> > > 
> > > MacBook1
> > > 
> > > workers content:
> > > 
> > > localhost
> > > 192.168.178.39 // second worker
> > > 
> > > masters content:
> > > 
> > > localhost
> > > 
> > > MacBook2
> > > 
> > > workers content:
> > > 
> > > localhost
> > > 192.168.178.101
> > > 
> > > masters content:
> > > 
> > > 192.168.178.101
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Actually I miss a complete guide in the documentation for setup a second
> > > worker to the master. When I realize that with your help, I will post 
> > > these
> > > instructions and place it to documentation available. I promise!
> > > 
> > > Hopefully you can help me.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Beat regards,
> > > Chris
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Am 22.09.2014 um 08:46 schrieb Christian Schwabe
> > > <> > > [email protected]> > > >:
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Hello guys,
> > > 
> > > can someone help to setup a cluster with a second worker?
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Best regards,
> > > Chris
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 




Reply via email to