We have a wide range of customers… so basically all of them ;) Anyhow would be good to have at least clear announcements like for 0.5 there is 2.2 minimum, for 0.6 there is… etc.. If the Hadoop UI integration could be delivered with 2.2 that would be awesome!
best Johannes > On 08 Dec 2014, at 19:02, Hitesh Shah <[email protected]> wrote: > > Thanks for the info, Douglas. We will not be dropping support for 2.4 for > sure at the moment. > > Anyone else have any comments in this regard? > > @Bikas/@Sid - what do we do about publishing jars for a release? We would > need to publish 2 or 3 sets? > > thanks > — Hitesh > > On Dec 4, 2014, at 12:51 PM, Moore, Douglas > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> 2.4.x and beyond for the customers we have >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >>> On Dec 4, 2014, at 12:36 PM, Hitesh Shah <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Hello folks >>> >>> Could folks who are following these mailing lists do a raise of hands on >>> which versions of Hadoop you are trying to run Tez on? >>> >>> 1) 2.2.x >>> 2) 2.3.x >>> 3) 2.4.x >>> 4) 2.5.x >>> 5) 2.6.x >>> >>> Given that we are building out the UI and for the large part, the History >>> UI ( i.e. the one which will display DAG details after an app has >>> disappeared ) will be dependent on YARN Timeline, the UI will not be >>> supported for Hadoop versions 2.2.x and 2.3.x given that they do not >>> support Timeline. >>> Likewise, ACLs support in Timeline was introduced in Hadoop 2.6.x - this >>> means ACLs will not be enforceable on Hadoop 2.4.x and 2.5.x >>> >>> Also, as part of TEZ-1696, I also propose changing the default version to >>> 2.6.0 given that secure Timeline is only available as of 2.6.0. >>> >>> Thoughts/concerns? >>> >>> thanks >>> — Hitesh >>> >
