> From: Baldwin, David
> Sent: September 2, 2014 5:39:17pm PDT
> To: user@tika.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Tika versions compatibility
> 
> Did you mean a different version number of Lucene other than 4.1? i.e. the 
> lucene.apache.org says 4.9 came out on 25 June 2014

Uwe said 4.10, not 4.1

-- Ken


> From: Uwe Schindler [mailto:u...@thetaphi.de] 
> Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2014 5:18 PM
> To: user@tika.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Tika versions compatibility
>  
> Hi,
> 
> Lucene itsself has no link to Tika at all, the APIs have no overlap. Apache 
> Solr, which is based on Lucene, uses Tika, but that is bundled and optional.
> 
> FYI, Lucene 4.10 comes out today...
> 
> Uwe
> 
> Am 3. September 2014 00:14:50 MESZ, schrieb "Baldwin, David" 
> <david_bald...@bmc.com>:
> Thanks,
> 
> Given that we are using Lucene 2.9.2, I will try it but we are not looking to 
> recompile or change it. Rather, after upgrading Tika, we hope to upgrade to 
> Lucene 4.9 (or latest) which I assume has been built against the latest Tika, 
> correct?
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nick Burch [mailto:apa...@gagravarr.org] 
> Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2014 3:37 PM
> To: user@tika.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Tika versions compatibility
> 
> On Tue, 2 Sep 2014, Baldwin, David wrote:
>  Is there any information I have not found googling around and 
>  searching the page that may show any changes from 0.6 to the current 
>  1.5 version that may make it incompatible on the API/Usage level?
> 
> We've strived to maintain backwards compatibility, so you ought to be fine 
> upgrading.
> It would be generally suggested to fix anything that is marked as deprecated 
> when compiling against the latest version, but I think you should be fine.
> 
> (If upgrading from 1.0 then anything in 1.x should be fine to upgrade to, and 
> I believe we have backwards-incompatible checking taking place on builds. 0.6 
> is older, but largely ought to be fine as well)
> 
> The main think you should notice is the greatly increased number of file 
> formats supported
> 
> Nick
> 
> --
> Uwe Schindler
> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, 28213 Bremen
> http://www.thetaphi.de



Reply via email to