On #2, I'd prefer not skipping elements.  I definitely understand the use case 
to extract what a human can see, but I suspect if your email address ends in 
'forensics.com', you'd probably like to see everything as well.

-----Original Message-----
From: Joseph Naegele [mailto:jnaeg...@grierforensics.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2016 4:14 PM
To: user@tika.apache.org
Subject: RE: script tags in LinkContentHandler

Great, sounds good. Would you like me to open a ticket?

With respect to parsing outlinks in Nutch, there's actually two problems:

1) <script> missing in LinkContentHandler
2) HtmlParser's DefaultHtmlMapper considers <script> a discardable element so 
it's discarded during the parse, similarly to <style>.

Does anyone have opinions on #2?

- Joe

-----Original Message-----
From: Markus Jelsma [mailto:markus.jel...@openindex.io]
Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2016 9:26 AM
To: user@tika.apache.org
Subject: RE: script tags in LinkContentHandler

Yes indeed! Script is missing and that's a mistake. See discussion at 
TIKA-1835. We should open a new ticket for it.
Markus

 
 
-----Original message-----
> From:Ken Krugler <kkrugler_li...@transpac.com>
> Sent: Tuesday 5th April 2016 22:24
> To: user@tika.apache.org
> Subject: Re: script tags in LinkContentHandler
> 
> Hi Joe,
> <br class="" />I was looking at the version of this file in the (git) 
> Tika-2.0 branch, not the (svn) trunk, and that change isn’t yet in 2.0 - my 
> mistake. 
> <br class="" />I’d rolled in Markus’s patch directly to support these other 
> link types, but I wish I’d remembered the old TIKA-503 discussion, as it 
> would have been better to make that support conditional on using a different 
> constructor, as it’s usually not a good idea to surprise consumers of parse 
> output with new types of data (links). 
> <br class="" />I’ll take this discussion over to TIKA-1835 now. 
> <br class="" />— Ken
> <br class="" /><br class="" />On Apr 5, 2016, at 12:53pm, Joseph Naegele 
> <jnaeg...@grierforensics.com <mailto:jnaeg...@grierforensics.com>> wrote: 
> <br class="Apple-interchange-newline" />Thanks Ken, I'm confused 
> though. The LinkContentHandler in 1.12 now collects <a>, <link>, <iframe> and 
> <img>, since https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-1835 
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-1835>. In my opinion, <script 
> src="…"> belongs in there with the rest of them. What do you think?
> Joe
> From: Ken Krugler [mailto:kkrugler_li...@transpac.com
> <mailto:kkrugler_li...@transpac.com>] <br class="" />Sent: Tuesday, 
> April 05, 2016 3:48 PM<br class="" />To: user@tika.apache.org 
> <mailto:user@tika.apache.org><br class="" />Subject: Re: script tags in 
> LinkContentHandler Hi Joe, On Apr 5, 2016, at 12:27pm, Joseph Naegele 
> <jnaeg...@grierforensics.com <mailto:jnaeg...@grierforensics.com>> wrote:
> Hi all,
> I'm using Nutch for crawling the web, and one of its built-in HTML parsers 
> uses Tika and its LinkContentHandler. I'm interested in collecting *all* 
> links on a web page, but I'm surprised the LinkContentHandler doesn't parse 
> <script> tags as links. When a <script> tags contains the "src" attribute, 
> the attribute should specify a URI and the tag should not contain any 
> content. 
> Is there any particular reason the LinkContentHandler doesn't parse <script> 
> tags, or is it just that I'm the first to look for this functionality? I can 
> ping the dev mailing list too if necessary. 
> I don’t think there’s a specific reason it’s not included, though see my 
> comment on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-503 
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-503>e..g what about <link> 
> elements? 
> — Ken
> <br class="" /><br class="" />Nutch's other built-in HTML parser collects all 
> "outlinks", including <script> tags, but I'd prefer to use Tika and 
> Boilerpipe. 
> Thanks,
> Joe Naegele
> ----------------
> Ken Krugler
> +1 530-210-6378
> http://www.scaleunlimited.com <http://www.scaleunlimited.com>custom
> big data solutions & training Hadoop, Cascading, Cassandra & Solr <br 
> class="Apple-interchange-newline" /><br 
> class="Apple-interchange-newline" /><br 
> class="Apple-interchange-newline" /><br 
> class="Apple-interchange-newline" />
 
> <br class="" />

Reply via email to