Hi Tim, I see! I wish I could help with the Javadocs. I'll share your post with friends to see if anyone can take a look.
Thanks for your reply. I was just concerned, having read the news of supply chain attacks, when I hadn't seen an announcement but various systems were incorporating the release. Good luck! Joe On Thu, May 29, 2025 at 12:11 PM Tim Allison <[email protected]> wrote: > It has been released. I'm running into a challenge trying to create > the javadocs [0][1] which are required for the web page update, which > is required for the announcement. I'm not thrilled with where we are > on this. :/ > > Any help would be appreciated. I'm sorry this got messed up. Once we > figure out the javadocs issue, I'll make the announcement and then > look into the detector regression. > > As for email..not clear to me. > > [0] https://lists.apache.org/thread/p4pwxcz9tt1wqn82wb4sx6drsrrtpofk > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/n7mjkfcsdf4lvwjtp1l3c77fs0yb5q0h > > On Thu, May 29, 2025 at 11:57 AM Joe Wicentowski <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > Has 3.2.0 been released? I ask for a few reasons. > > > > First, the Tika homepage and download page don't show a 3.2.0 release > and instead show 3.1.0 as the current release: > > > > https://tika.apache.org/ > > https://tika.apache.org/download.html > > > > However, there are indications that 3.2.0 is out, including the fact > that Homebrew automatically picked up 3.2.0: > > > > https://github.com/Homebrew/homebrew-core/pull/224764 > > > > And similarly, Craig's note below says: > > > > > ... my dependency management tool made me aware that 3.2.0 was > available ... > > > > And other projects have picked up the release via Dependabot: > > > > https://github.com/eXist-db/exist/pull/5754 > > > > I checked here but didn't see a release announcement. > > > > On the possibly separate topic of the mailing list, could it be that > there is an issue with the mailing list? I didn't receive Craig's note > directly (only quoted in Pontus's post). I don't see Craig's post in the > list archives either: > > > > https://lists.apache.org/[email protected] > > > > I hope this info helps! I'd be happy to provide any info if needed. > > > > Joe > > > > On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 6:39 PM Pontus Amberg <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >> I have also encountered the same issue in a simple test that tries to > identify an > >> "application/vnd.google-earth.kmz" file. I can work around the "invalid > mark" problem > >> by wrapping the InputStream used in Tike.detect(InputStream stream, > String name) > >> with an TikaInputStream. Sadly I still have problems with 3.2.0 since > the test now > >> fails since the "application/vnd.google-earth.kmz" file is detected as a > >> plain "application/zip". > >> > >> Reverting back to 3.1.0 makes the detection work with a plain > InputStream > >> > >> /Pontus > >> > >> On 2025/05/28 16:33:23 Craig Muchinsky via user wrote: > >> > I tested using the release, my dependency management tool made me > aware > >> > that 3.2.0 was available so I decided to kick the tires and ran into > this > >> > issue. I will have to spend some time on a reproduction scenario > >> > > >> > On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 1:33 AM Tilman Hausherr <[email protected]> > >> > wrote: > >> > > >> > > Did you test with the release or with the candidate or with an > earlier > >> > > build? A bug like you mentioned was fixed just a few days ago. > Please share > >> > > the file and some minimal code. Tilman On 5/28/2025 2 > >> > > *Caution*: External ([email protected]) > >> > > First-Time Sender Details > >> > > < > https://protection.inkyphishfence.com/details?id=Y29sbGlicmEvY3JhaWcubXVjaGluc2t5QGNvbGxpYnJhLmNvbS8xMDA5MGNmMjBhODUwMjViNzQzYzVlM2VhYjk3MDI4MS8xNzQ4NDEwNDIyLjcwMTE2Nzg=#key=31268a81d07715bf5cf4cef79d6ad111 > > > >> > > Report This Email > >> > > < > https://protection.inkyphishfence.com/report?id=Y29sbGlicmEvY3JhaWcubXVjaGluc2t5QGNvbGxpYnJhLmNvbS8xMDA5MGNmMjBhODUwMjViNzQzYzVlM2VhYjk3MDI4MS8xNzQ4NDEwNDIyLjcwMTE2Nzg=#key=31268a81d07715bf5cf4cef79d6ad111 > > > >> > > > >> > > Did you test with the release or with the candidate or with an > earlier > >> > > > >> > > build? A bug like you mentioned was fixed just a few days ago. > Please > >> > > > >> > > share the file and some minimal code. > >> > > > >> > > Tilman > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > On 5/28/2025 2:08 AM, Craig Muchinsky via user wrote: > >> > > > >> > > > After upgrading to tika 3.2.0, I started seeing the following > >> > > > >> > > > exception when attempting to detect the mime type for a given > file, > >> > > > >> > > > I'm wondering if something in the way input streams are handled > has > >> > > > >> > > > changed, or if this might be a regression? > >> > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > Caused by: java.io.IOException: Resetting to invalid mark > >> > > > >> > > > at [email protected] > >> > > /java.io.BufferedInputStream.implReset(BufferedInputStream.java:583) > >> > > > >> > > > at [email protected] > >> > > /java.io.BufferedInputStream.reset(BufferedInputStream.java:569) > >> > > > >> > > > at > >> > > app//org.apache.tika.io > .BoundedInputStream.reset(BoundedInputStream.java:115) > >> > > > >> > > > at > >> > > > app//org.apache.tika.detect.zip.DefaultZipContainerDetector.detectStreaming(DefaultZipContainerDetector.java:279) > >> > > > >> > > > at > >> > > > app//org.apache.tika.detect.zip.DefaultZipContainerDetector.detect(DefaultZipContainerDetector.java:192) > >> > > > >> > > > at > >> > > > app//org.apache.tika.detect.CompositeDetector.detect(CompositeDetector.java:84) > >> > > > >> > > > at app//org.apache.tika.Tika.detect(Tika.java:160) > >> > > > >> > > > at app//org.apache.tika.Tika.detect(Tika.java:185) > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > >
