On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 10:21 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Simon, > > > > I guess this is the issue Raymond mentioned: > http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/JAVA-9. > > I don't know if my SCA/Tuscany knowledge is sound enough to be able to > provide such an implementation, but I will give it a try. > > So expect frequent rookie questions J > > > > Bye, > > Daniel > > > > > > *Von:* Simon Laws [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > *Gesendet:* Dienstag, 16. September 2008 20:20 > *An:* [email protected] > *Betreff:* Re: Multiplicity issue [TUSCANY-2281] > > > > > > On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 11:00 PM, Simon Nash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Raymond Feng wrote: > > Hi, > > This is an interesting situation: The SCA APIs defined by OSOA have some > deficiencies which are being fixed under OASIS. Now the question is how we > branch the development streams to support the different level of the SCA > specifications. > > Should we start to look into the possibility to create a 2.0 branch to > contain the upcoming work to support OASIS SCA specs and other disruptive > changes? > > The spec change to resolve OASIS issue JAVA-9 is upwards compatible. It > requires the addition of two new methods on org.osoa.sca.ComponentContext. > There is no need to create an incompatible branch for this change. > > Simon > > > > Thanks, > Raymond > -------------------------------------------------- > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Monday, September 15, 2008 8:53 AM > To: <[email protected]> > Subject: Multiplicity issue [TUSCANY-2281] > > Hi all, > > I just wanted to ask about the state of JIIRA > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2281. > Am I the only one that misses this feature ? > Are there any plans if/when/how this may be implemented ? > Can I somehow contribute ? (I could provide a test case if that helps) > > Bye, > Daniel > > > > > > > Hi Daniel > > I have to admit that I haven't looked at this since the last time we spoke > on this. I looks, from what Simon says, that we should be able to solve this > by adding a couple of new methods to the CompnentContext which would live > quite happily next to what is there already. Are you interested in providing > an implementation of these? If so we can just commit your patch. > > Simon >
Hi Daniel Yep, that's the JIRA. Re. questions. Ask away ;-) Simon
