Thanks Mike, We are currently evaluating BPEL implementations. For my current project we will proabaly need to support 2 diffferent implementations. ODE may be one but we will need to support another, possibly Oracle. I appreciate the offer to discuss this further. I will contact you as soon as we make our decision.
Phil -----Original Message----- From: Mike Edwards [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, December 22, 2008 5:35 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: bpel Phil, Do you have a particular other BPEL implementation in mind? As Simon says in his reply to you, Tuscany is structured to allow different implementations of BPEL to to be used rather than ODE. How easy or difficult it is to plug in another implementation of BPEL will mostly depend on the interfaces that the BPEL engine offers - it must be possible for the Tuscany code to tell the BPEL engine to start a particular BPEL process and for Tuscany to be able to call operations on that process - and to provide the implementation for partnerLinks from the process. I'll be happy to discuss this further with you. Yours, Mike. Sykes, Phil wrote: > I can see that tuscany uses ode for the bpel implementation. Does > tuscany provide a way to plugin a differnent bpel implementation? > Actually, the question is more broad than that….can you change the > implementation of any of the components of tuscany or is it tightly > coupled to products that ship with it? > > > > Thanks, > > > > Phil > > > > Philip Sykes * Principal Java Developer, Banner Product Engineering * > SunGard Higher Education * 3 Country View Road, Malvern PA 19335 * Tel > 610 578 5185 * [email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]> * www.sungardhe.com > <http://www.sungardhe.com/> > > >
