Hi Simon, This is the approach we are taking now. But I would like to have a uniform and cleaner approach. We use MDB, SCA and in the feature Camel.
If I can find a way to fillter JMS headers it would be great. Thanks Matt On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 5:17 AM, Simon Laws <[email protected]>wrote: > On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 10:58 AM, Simon Laws <[email protected]> > wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 11:26 PM, Matt Madhavan <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Hi Simon, > >> Can u please throw some more light on this one? Any additional > information > >> will be appreciated. > >> > >> Thanks > >> Matt > >> > >> On Jan 27, 2012 1:15 PM, "Simon Laws" <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>> > >>> On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 11:31 PM, Matt Madhavan < > [email protected]> > >>> wrote: > >>> > HiSimon, > >>> > Is there any sample for SCA 1.x? We are limited to IBM implementation > >>> > which > >>> > is 1.x. > >>> > > >>> > Thanks > >>> > Matt > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 9:23 AM, Simon Laws < > [email protected]> > >>> > wrote: > >>> >> > >>> >> On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 9:15 PM, Matt Madhavan < > [email protected]> > >>> >> wrote: > >>> >> > Hello, > >>> >> > I have an SCA binding that reads a message from a JMS Queue > >>> >> > (REQUEST_QUEUE)invokes a bean and sends the reply to another JMS > >>> >> > Queue(RESPONSE_QUEUE). > >>> >> > > >>> >> > Sometimes the message sender adds a replyTo Destinationmessage > header > >>> >> > value > >>> >> > (Lets say OTHER_RESPONSE_QUEUE). This 'overrides' > my RESPONSE_QUEUE. > >>> >> > > >>> >> > I would like an example where I can filter this Header value to > that > >>> >> > the > >>> >> > reply gets put in RESPONSE_QUEUE and not in OTHER_RESPONSE_QUEUE. > >>> >> > > >>> >> > Can some one please point me to an example please? > >>> >> > > >>> >> > Thanks in advance! > >>> >> > > >>> >> > Matt Madhavan > >>> >> > >>> >> Hi Matt > >>> >> > >>> >> I don't remember that there is a specific example like this but you > >>> >> could do it I think by dropping in a binding interceptor using a > >>> >> policy. There is a header policy for JMS you could take a look at > [1] > >>> >> but I'm a little confused as the interceptor doesn't seem to do > >>> >> anything useful at the moment. The comment suggest that the > processing > >>> >> happens elsewhere. There is a test for this policy [2]. You could > >>> >> write a policy specifically for redirecting the response. > >>> >> > >>> >> The basic idea of this is that you write an policy interceptor (that > >>> >> has access to the JMS message). To get this interceptor in the right > >>> >> place you then write appropriate policy configuration to tell the > >>> >> runtime to apply the policy to the service you are interested in. I > >>> >> can give you the basic steps if looking at the code doesn't help. > >>> >> > >>> >> Simon > >>> >> > >>> >> [1] > >>> >> > >>> >> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/sca-java-2.x/trunk/modules/binding-jms-runtime/src/main/java/org/apache/tuscany/sca/binding/jms/policy/header/ > >>> >> [2] > >>> >> > >>> >> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/sca-java-2.x/trunk/testing/itest/jms/policy-headers/ > >>> >> > >>> >> -- > >>> >> Apache Tuscany committer: tuscany.apache.org > >>> >> Co-author of a book about Tuscany and SCA: tuscanyinaction.com > >>> > > >>> > > >>> Hi Matt > >>> > >>> IIRC in the IBM implementation there is a customer wire format handler > >>> in the JMS binding that we don't have in Tuscany. If that has access > >>> to the Message you may be able to do something directly with that. > >>> > >>> Regards > >>> > >>> Simon > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Apache Tuscany committer: tuscany.apache.org > >>> Co-author of a book about Tuscany and SCA: tuscanyinaction.com > > > > Hi Matt > > > > I looked into this and it's not obvious you can get at the whole JMS > > message in the custom wire format handler and WebSphere doesn't > > currently expose a mechanism for adding arbitrary interceptors like > > Tuscany does. A question for the WebSphere list I think. Try > > https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/forums/forum.jspa?forumID=1662 > > > > Regards > > > > Simon > > > > -- > > Apache Tuscany committer: tuscany.apache.org > > Co-author of a book about Tuscany and SCA: tuscanyinaction.com > > Another thought on this is that you could define your service > interface with a single operation that takes a JMS message and reset > the replyTo destination inside that service implementation. This is a > more manual approach and you'd have to take responsibility of > forwarding the message on to the real service implementation but it > may allow you to do what you need to do. > > Regards > > Simon > > -- > Apache Tuscany committer: tuscany.apache.org > Co-author of a book about Tuscany and SCA: tuscanyinaction.com >
