> I observed from the logs that cases are divided among the the 2 running > instances of cas consumers , but some of the cases seem to be missed out, which > didn't go to any of the 2 instances. I can't understand why so ?
This is strange. UIMA-AS doesn't treat CasConsumers any differently, since any annotator can write data to a file system or DB. Can you trace in the logs the CasReferenceId of the missing CASes through each of the annotators and see why they don't complete the pipeline? ~Burn