> I observed from the logs that cases are divided among the the 2 running
> instances of cas consumers , but some of the cases seem to be missed out,
which
> didn't go to any of the 2 instances. I can't understand why so ?

This is strange.  UIMA-AS doesn't treat CasConsumers any differently, since
any annotator can write data to a file system or DB.  Can you trace in the
logs the CasReferenceId of the missing CASes through each of the annotators
and see why they don't complete the pipeline?

~Burn

Reply via email to