I don't quite understand your question. What do you mean by cloning? Are you creating another array that references the same FSs or are you also replicating each FS in the array? What appears to be wrong? Are you expecting a different parse tree when the rules are different but instead getting identical trees? If so, why do you think that's a UIMA problem.
It may not be relevant, but my view is that CASes should be treated as places to store public information that is to be shared amongst annotators. Any intermediate results computed by an annotator should not be stored in the CAS ... basically because there is no delete method. FeatureStructures can be removed from indexes but that does not delete them. The only form of garbage collection occurs when a CAS is serialized to a file or to a remote service, as then only indexed FeatureStructures are sent. ~Burn On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 5:33 PM, Administrator < roman.alexandrovich.muel...@gmail.com> wrote: > Dear uima user, > > here is what i am trying. One analysis engine receives an array of feature > structures. It clones all feature structures of the array and produces a > parse tree. The cloning and parsing happens several times but with > different rules. However the result is always a parse forrest in witch all > parse trees are the same (the last one). Creating new FeatureStructures > with the new keyword has the same result. What can i do? > > Thanks in advance > Roman
