Hi Jens, I did indeed use those methods for a while and they were working fine, but I was mostly using them to perform sanity checks on some arbitrary span annotations, and once I made sure those were being created OK I reverted back to stock uima-fit.
They should be ok, though; the patch basically adds very little variation on Richard's methods for indexing covered/covering annotations, and while I was using them, they worked. Funny coincidence: Just a few days ago I was thinking that it would be possible to provide most of the indexing features of CASUtil via interval trees. No idea about how expensive this would be, though. This may be a good direction to look into if you happen to feel inclined to rewrite those methods :) Best, jta On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 11:58 AM, Jens Grivolla <j+...@grivolla.net> wrote: > Ok Richard, I'll look into it, but I don't promise anything at this point > (tons of project deliverables coming up)... > > -- Jens > > On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 2:03 PM, Richard Eckart de Castilho < > r...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > Hi Jens, > > > > :) don't you want to test and apply it? My next projected time slot for > > uimaFIT is in December. > > > > Best, > > > > -- Richard > > > > > On 23.10.2015, at 11:09, Jens Grivolla <j+...@grivolla.net> wrote: > > > > > > I'd really like to have that functionality also (we'll need to do > > something > > > like that quite soon), so I just voted on the issue... > > > > > > I haven't tested the patch yet. José, have you been using this over the > > > last few months? > > > > > > -- Jens > > > > > -- entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem
