Hi, ruta-core.jar it's enough.
It will be fantastic if i could access the snapshot repository. 2017-02-23 13:03 GMT+01:00 Peter Klügl <peter.klu...@averbis.com>: > Hi, > > > what do you need? Only ruta-core.jar or also the Eclipse plugins/update > site? > > I will prepare a new RC for the next release soon. > > There should be snapshot artifacts built by jenkins in the snapshot > repository. I am out-of-office today so do not have the link right now. (If > you want to build it yourself, the svn source repo can be accessed by > anyone) > > > Best, > > > Peter > > > > > Am 23.02.2017 um 08:06 schrieb José Vicente Moyano Murillo: > >> Hi Peter, good morning. >> >> Have we any opportunity to get a fixed version? I mean a snapshot or an >> access to the repo. >> >> Regards >> >> 2017-02-22 10:38 GMT+01:00 José Vicente Moyano Murillo <moya...@aia.es>: >> >> you're right >>> >>> % is performing some kind of "or". >>> >>> So we will wait for the new release. >>> >>> Many thanks >>> >>> 2017-02-22 9:54 GMT+01:00 Peter Klügl <peter.klu...@averbis.com>: >>> >>> I actually wonder why your rules work. I am quite sure that they match >>>> too often, i. e. they match also if only one of the conjunct rule >>>> elements match. >>>> >>>> You can simply try that by using a wrong string in the check like "NG" >>>> instead of "Neil Gaiman" >>>> >>>> Anyways, the problem will be fixed in a few minutes and will be part of >>>> the next release. >>>> >>>> >>>> Best, >>>> >>>> >>>> Peter >>>> >>>> >>>> Am 22.02.2017 um 09:38 schrieb Peter Klügl: >>>> >>>>> Thanks. Maybe its just a bug in 2.5.0 I already fixed. I'll investigate >>>>> >>>> it. >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Am 22.02.2017 um 09:24 schrieb José Vicente Moyano Murillo: >>>>> >>>>>> Thank you very much Peter. Your advice was amazing. >>>>>> >>>>>> We tried the first option using Conjunct rules and as you said it does >>>>>> >>>>> not >>>> >>>>> work with version 2.5.0. But we change a little your example and it >>>>>> >>>>> works >>>> >>>>> perfectly witn 2.4.0 and 2.5.0 >>>>>> >>>>>> We use theses examples with success: >>>>>> >>>>>> DECLARE Annotation RuleDetection; >>>>>> Book{ -> CREATE(NeilsBook) } <- { >>>>>> Attribute{Attribute.name=="title", Attribute.ct=="Norse >>>>>> >>>>> Mythology"}" >>>> >>>>> % >>>>>> Attribute{Attribute.name=="author", >>>>>> Attribute.ct=="Neil >>>>>> Gaiman"};" >>>>>> }; >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> DECLARE Annotation RuleDetection; >>>>>> Book{ -> CREATE(NeilsBook) } <- { >>>>>> Attribute{FEATURE("name","title"), FEATURE("ct", "Norse >>>>>> >>>>> Mythology")}" >>>> >>>>> % >>>>>> Attribute{FEATURE("name","author"), FEATURE("ct", >>>>>> "Neil >>>>>> Gaiman")}; >>>>>> }; >>>>>> >>>>>> DECLARE Annotation RuleDetection; >>>>>> Book{ -> CREATE(NeilsBook) } <- { >>>>>> Attribute{Attribute.name=="title", Attribute.ct=="Norse >>>>>> >>>>> Mythology"}" >>>> >>>>> % >>>>>> Attribute{FEATURE("name","author"), FEATURE("ct", >>>>>> "Neil >>>>>> Gaiman")}; >>>>>> }; >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> May be the problem is with when we use Identifiers: >>>>>> a1:Attribute and a2:Attribute >>>>>> >>>>>> In any case thank you very much for your help. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> 2017-02-21 17:46 GMT+01:00 Peter Klügl <peter.klu...@averbis.com>: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I'd normally say that you need the conjunt rules construct to specify >>>>>>> >>>>>> an >>>> >>>>> AND between two rule element independent of the position: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Book{-> NeilsBook}<-{ >>>>>>> a1:Attribute{a1.name=="title", a1.ct=="Norse Mythology"} >>>>>>> % a2:Attribute{a2.name=="author", a2.ct=="Neil Gaiman"}; >>>>>>> }; >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> However, I just noted that there is a problem with conjunct rules. I >>>>>>> haven't used it in a long time and the test coverage much lower than >>>>>>> >>>>>> the >>>> >>>>> other constructs. I'll create a ticket for it and fix it. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Without conjunct rules, you need some boolean variables for cheking >>>>>>> >>>>>> the >>>> >>>>> AND, which looks all but declarative: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> BOOLEAN ft, fa; >>>>>>> FOREACH(book) Book{}{ >>>>>>> book{-> ft = false, fa = false}; >>>>>>> book->{a1:Attribute{a1.name=="title", a1.ct=="Norse >>>>>>> Mythology"-> >>>>>>> ft=true};}; >>>>>>> book->{a2:Attribute{a2.name=="author", a2.ct=="Neil Gaiman"-> >>>>>>> fa=true};}; >>>>>>> book{ft,fa -> NeilsBook}; >>>>>>> } >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ... or with a BLOCK... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> BLOCK(book) Book{}{ >>>>>>> Document{-> ft = false, fa = false}; >>>>>>> a1:Attribute{a1.name=="title", a1.ct=="Norse Mythology"-> >>>>>>> >>>>>> ft=true}; >>>> >>>>> a2:Attribute{a2.name=="author", a2.ct=="Neil Gaiman"-> fa=true}; >>>>>>> Document{ft,fa -> NeilsBook}; >>>>>>> } >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> If the order of the attributes is known, you can avoid the AND check >>>>>>> >>>>>> and >>>> >>>>> just specify a sequential constraint: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Book{-> NeilsBook}<-{ >>>>>>> a1:Attribute{a1.name=="title", a1.ct=="Norse Mythology"} >>>>>>> # a2:Attribute{a2.name=="author", a2.ct=="Neil Gaiman"}; >>>>>>> }; >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> If you need to check on the complete title with the URL, you can >>>>>>> >>>>>> replace >>>> >>>>> the coveredText comparison with a REGEXP condition. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> (tested with UIMA Ruta 2.5.0) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Best, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Peter >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Am 21.02.2017 um 13:58 schrieb José Vicente Moyano Murillo: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hello everyone >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I'm planning to use RUTA to create some annotations. But i'm not >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> able to >>>> >>>>> accomplish my objective. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> This is my case right now: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I have a text annotated with some annotations "*Book*". >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Under "*Book*" annotation i have a few annotations "*Attribute*" >>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>> stores some information about the book. Each "*Attribute*" has a >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> feature >>>> >>>>> " >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> *name*" and a feature "*parent*" to its parent (one "*Book*" >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> annotation). >>>> >>>>> And example could be a text with 2 "*Book*" annotations: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> "*Book*" annotation number 1 with 3 nested attributes >>>>>>>> 1.- *Attribute* with name feature equals "title" -> covered text: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> "Norse >>>> >>>>> Mythology >>>>>>>> <http://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/norse-mythology-neil- >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> gaiman/1124023596;jsessionid=FD1D8F9690602616CA59B38CFE9290 >>>>>>> 06.prodny_store02-atgap08?ean=9780393609097> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> " >>>>>>>> 2.- *Attribute* with name feature equals "author" -> covered text: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> "Neil >>>> >>>>> Gaiman" >>>>>>>> 3.- *Attribute* with name feature equals "language" - > covered >>>>>>>> text: >>>>>>>> "English" >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> "*Book*" annotation number 2 with 3 nested attributes >>>>>>>> 1.- *Attribute* with name feature equals "title" -> covered text: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> "Never >>>> >>>>> Never >>>>>>>> <http://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/never-never-james-patterson >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> /1123863634; >>>> >>>>> jsessionid=FD1D8F9690602616CA59B38CFE929006.prodny_store02- >>>>>>> >>>>>> atgap08?ean= >>>> >>>>> 9780316433174> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> " >>>>>>>> 2.- *Attribute* with name feature equals "author" -> covered text: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> "James >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Patterson" >>>>>>>> 3.- *Attribute* with name feature equals "language" - > covered >>>>>>>> text: >>>>>>>> "English" >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I need to respect this schema but i have this question: >>>>>>>> It is possible to create and annotation over a book for a given >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> author >>>> >>>>> name >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> and a given title name? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thank's in advance >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>> >