Thanks Nelson for testing this change. I will commit it soon. Jerry On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 1:57 PM, nelson rivera <nelsonriver...@gmail.com> wrote:
> jerry , i tested the new snapshot of uima-as that you pushed into > apache snapshot repo to fix problem with the type priorities, and the > problem is solved. I tested with uima as service with priority > configuration in the aggregate's descriptor and every things is ok. > thanks for your quick attention > > 2017-08-25 16:47 GMT-04:00, Jaroslaw Cwiklik <cwik...@apache.org>: > > Nelson, I just pushed a new snapshot of uima-as to apache snapshot repo. > > This is a trunk level code not a release. Please deploy it and see if the > > problem with the type priorites is fixed. I did test it with a simple > type > > priority configuration. > > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ > snapshots/org/apache/uima/uima-as/2.9.1-SNAPSHOT/uima- > as-2.9.1-20170825.204106-5.tar.gz > > > > Jerry > > > > > > On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 8:25 AM, nelson rivera <nelsonriver...@gmail.com > > > > wrote: > > > >> Thanks for your attention Jerry, i wait the solution to integrate it > >> in production > >> > >> 2017-08-24 14:27 GMT-04:00, Jaroslaw Cwiklik <cwik...@apache.org>: > >> > Nelson, I was able to recreate this problem and am working on a fix > >> > now. > >> > Jerry > >> > > >> > On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 3:39 PM, nelson rivera > >> > <nelsonriver...@gmail.com > >> > > >> > wrote: > >> > > >> >> Jerry, i understand and wait. Thanks for your attention. > >> >> > >> >> 2017-08-16 15:09 GMT-04:00, Jaroslaw Cwiklik <cwik...@apache.org>: > >> >> > Nelson, I need more time to look into this. Quite busy at a moment. > >> >> Unless > >> >> > someone else wants to jump in here I will address the problem when > I > >> am > >> >> > done with current work load, > >> >> > > >> >> > Jerry > >> >> > > >> >> > On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 4:36 PM, Jaroslaw Cwiklik > >> >> > <cwik...@apache.org > >> > > >> >> > wrote: > >> >> > > >> >> >> Thanks, I will try to test this scenario and get back to ya. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Jerry > >> >> >> > >> >> >> On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 4:27 PM, nelson rivera < > >> >> nelsonriver...@gmail.com> > >> >> >> wrote: > >> >> >> > >> >> >>> Yes, that is happening > >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> 2017-08-14 15:40 GMT-04:00, Jaroslaw Cwiklik <cwik...@apache.org > >: > >> >> >>> > Please confirm that this is happening: > >> >> >>> > > >> >> >>> > 1) You deploy an aggregate and specify TypePriorities in > >> >> >>> > aggregate > >> >> >>> analysis > >> >> >>> > engine descriptor. > >> >> >>> > 2) After uima-as client initilizes, you call client's > >> >> >>> > public ProcessingResourceMetaData getMetaData(); > >> >> >>> > 3) You check the returned meta and the type priorities are > >> >> >>> > missing > >> >> >>> > > >> >> >>> > You are observing correct behavior when you declare type > >> priorities > >> >> in > >> >> >>> > a delegate analysis engine descriptor of the aggregate > >> >> >>> > > >> >> >>> > Jerry > >> >> >>> > > >> >> >>> > On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 12:12 PM, nelson rivera < > >> >> >>> nelsonriver...@gmail.com> > >> >> >>> > wrote: > >> >> >>> > > >> >> >>> >> i have configured a priorityList in the descriptor of my > >> aggregate > >> >> >>> >> engine, with the objetive of use correctly subiterator() > >> >> >>> >> function > >> >> >>> >> in > >> >> >>> >> my client code over the result CAS. > >> >> >>> >> > >> >> >>> >> After deploy the aggregate in uima-as, in my client code that > >> >> >>> >> consumes > >> >> >>> >> de uima-as service aggregate to check the priorityList > >> >> >>> >> configured > >> >> >>> >> i > >> >> >>> >> use the instruccion > >> >> >>> >> uimaAsynchronousEngine.getMetaData().getTypePriorities(); and > >> not > >> >> >>> >> appear the priority configured. This does that the use of > >> >> subiterator > >> >> >>> >> not have the expected behavior in the uima-as client. > >> >> >>> >> > >> >> >>> >> If the configuration of priorityList is made in the descriptor > >> >> >>> >> of > >> >> one > >> >> >>> >> of the delegate of the aggregate, then if the instruccion > >> >> >>> >> uimaAsynchronousEngine.getMetaData().getTypePriorities() in > >> >> client > >> >> >>> >> code shows the priorityList configured and then the behavior > >> >> >>> >> is > >> >> >>> >> the > >> >> >>> >> expected. > >> >> >>> >> > >> >> >>> > > >> >> >>> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> > > >> >> > >> > > >> > > >
