Hey,

I tried to understand the rules that you suggested and have a few questions 
(see below).
What we have (successfully) implemented so far is a set of rules that change 
the value of the stored string, in order to produce some kind of expression 
that is evaluated subsequently:
a) replace numbers: "eins" becomes "(1)", "zwei|zwan" becomes "(2)"...
b) replaced factors: "zig" becomes "*(10)", "hundert" becomes "*(100)".... and 
remove "and"
c) other ruta rules interpret the expression in chain-like order

"dreimillionenzweitausendvierhunderteinundzwanzig"
a) "(3)millionen(2)tausend(4)hundert(1)und(2)zig"
b) "(3)*(1000000)(2)*(1000)(4)(100)(1)(20)"
c) "(3)*(1000000)(2)*(1000)(400)(21)" => "(3)*(1000000)(2)*(1000)(421)" => 
"(3000000)(2000)(421)" => "(3000000)(2421)" => "(3002421)"

However, we use replaceAll(string, pattern, patter) in all these 
transformations and fear that it might not be the optimal solution for UIMA 
Ruta.
Do you have any suggestion?


Here are the questions for your rules:
1)
> Before you can apply the dictionaries, you need to split the RutaBasics  
> using some conjunction words in order to map the subword segments.
How exactly can I do that? I know there is SPLIT() but that can only split an 
annotation
Dominik Terweh
Praktikant

DROOMS


Drooms GmbH
Eschersheimer Landstraße 6
60322 Frankfurt, Germany
www.drooms.com

Phone:
Fax:
Mail: d.ter...@drooms.com


Subscribe to the Drooms newsletter
>>> https://drooms.com/en/newsletter?utm_source=newslettersignup&utm_medium=emailsignature

Drooms GmbH; Sitz der Gesellschaft / Registered Office: Eschersheimer Landstr. 
6, D-60322 Frankfurt am Main; Geschaeftsfuehrung / Management Board: Alexandre 
Grellier;
Registergericht / Court of Registration: Amtsgericht Frankfurt am Main, HRB 
76454; Finanzamt / Tax Office: Finanzamt Frankfurt am Main, USt-IdNr.: DE 
224007190

on the basic of another inlaying one, or do I understand it wrong?
Because if I could split words then German agglutinated numbers would be no 
problem (since we have a working solution for English).

2)
Is there a special reason, why you use 3 for 'thousand', when you use it with 
POW(10, x)? Intuitively I would just use 1000.

3)
In your "combination with multipliers like 3 million"-rule (Rule 1), you shift 
the annotation to span over (1,4), should it not be (1,3)?

4)
In Rule 1, is num{IS(NumericValue) )-> SHIFT(NumericValue,1,4)} just a 
different way of writing num:NumericValue{)-> SHIFT(NumericValue,1,4)}?

5)
What exactly is the function of the NEAR() in your Rule 1? Is it there do match 
only "3", "3-Million" and "3-Million" but not "3-"?

6)
I tried to play Rule 1 through in my head with "zweitausendeins" and 
"dreimillionenzweitausendeins":
This works good for the first example

(num{IS(NumericValue)-> SHIFT(NumericValue,1,4)}
//value = 2

  (Multiplicator{-> num.value = (2 * (POW(10,3)))}
//value = 2000
    add2:NumericValue?{-> num.value = (2000 + 1), UNMARK(add2)}));
//value = 2001


But fails for the second:

(num{IS(NumericValue)-> SHIFT(NumericValue,1,4)}
//value = 3

  (Multiplicator{-> num.value = (2 * (POW(10,6)))}
//value = 3000000
    add2:NumericValue?{-> num.value = (3000000 + 2), UNMARK(add2)})
//value = 3000002, after 1st iteration

  (Multiplicator{-> num.value = (3000002 * (POW(10,3)))}
//value = 3000002000
    add2:NumericValue?{-> num.value = (3000002000+ 1), UNMARK(add2)}));
//value = 3000002001

On 28.08.19, 13:48, "Peter Klügl" <peter.klu...@averbis.com> wrote:

    Hi,


    we (Averbis) have an annotator which does exactly what you describe, but
    unfortunetly I cannot share it.  However, I can tell that the annotator
    is almost completely implemented in Ruta and uses no Ruta language
    extensions.


    If you want to learn more about language extensions, then there are
    example projects in the Ruta trunk: ruta-core-ext and
    example-projects/ruta-ep-example-extensions


    If you want to build the annotator with Ruta rules, I can help you
    create it.


    As a starting point you need some dictionaries (wordtables) for numbers
    (ein;1\neins;1\nzwei;2....) , exponents/multiplicators (tausend;3) and
    special characters (½). For German that's not too much, maybe one
    hundred entries overall is a good start.

    Before you can apply the dictionaries, you need to split the RutaBasics
    using some conjunction words in order to map the subword segments. You
    can do that with a simple regex rule:

    "und" -> ConjunctionFragment;

    Then, you can write some rules that combine numbers using additions,
    multiplications and exponents, e.g., something like:


    FOREACH(num, false) NumericValue{}{

            // combination with multipliers like 3 million
            (num{IS(NumericValue)-> SHIFT(NumericValue,1,4)}
    SPECIAL?{REGEXP("-"), NEAR(W,0,1,true)}
                (
                    Multiplicator{-> num.value = (num.value * (POW(10,
    Multiplicator.value)))}
                    add2:NumericValue?{-> num.value = (num.value +
    add2.value), UNMARK(add2)}
                )*);


            // fünfundzwanzig
            (num{PARTOF(W)-> SHIFT(NumericValue,1,3)} ConjunctionFragment
    add:NumericValue.value!=0{PARTOF(W), IF((NumericValue.value%1) == 0) ->
    UNMARK(add)})
                {-> num.value = (num.value + add.value)};

    }


    At the end you get about 200 lines of Ruta ...




    Best,


    Peter

    Am 27.08.2019 um 16:30 schrieb Dominik Terweh:
    >
    > Dear All,
    >
    >
    >
    > When working with German written out numbers I figured, that in order
    > to get what I want (the numeric value of a written number) I need to
    > either hard code every single number name and use Wordtable or I need
    > to work with the string. However, this made me thinking that this
    > would probably be better done in a Language Extension. Unfortunately I
    > am not sure how these work and how I can include them in my project.
    > Also the manual did not really help me there
    > 
(https://uima.apache.org/d/ruta-current/tools.ruta.book.html#ugr.tools.ruta.language.extensions).
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > Further I was wondering if there are any readily available extensions
    > that can be used, e.g. to convert a string of number words into actual
    > numbers (or replacing words on a dictionary basis, such as “one”:”1”,
    > “two”:”2”,…), or an extension, that can evaluate a calculation in the
    > form of a string (like “100*5+55”).  If something exists for number
    > conversion it would be interesting to see if it does both, annotation
    > and calculation, and how it handles different languages such as:
    >
    > 1) input is one token (like numbers in german, einundzwanzig)
    >
    > 2) input is several tokens jointly representing one number (like in
    > english: twenty two)
    >
    > And mixed cases such as:
    >
    > 3) input is combination of number and string (like: 10 Millionen)
    >
    >
    >
    > Thank you in advance for your help,
    >
    > Best
    >
    > Dominik
    >
    > Dominik Terweh
    > Praktikant
    >
    > *Drooms GmbH*
    > Eschersheimer Landstraße 6
    > 60322 Frankfurt, Germany
    > www.drooms.com <http://www.drooms.com>
    >
    > Phone:
    > Mail: d.ter...@drooms.com <mailto:d.ter...@drooms.com>
    >
    > 
<https://drooms.com/en/newsletter?utm_source=newslettersignup&utm_medium=emailsignature>
    >
    > *Drooms GmbH*; Sitz der Gesellschaft / Registered Office:
    > Eschersheimer Landstr. 6, D-60322 Frankfurt am Main; Geschäftsführung
    > / Management Board: Alexandre Grellier;
    > Registergericht / Court of Registration: Amtsgericht Frankfurt am
    > Main, HRB 76454; Finanzamt / Tax Office: Finanzamt Frankfurt am Main,
    > USt-IdNr.: DE 224007190
    >
    --
    Dr. Peter Klügl
    R&D Text Mining/Machine Learning

    Averbis GmbH
    Salzstr. 15
    79098 Freiburg
    Germany

    Fon: +49 761 708 394 0
    Fax: +49 761 708 394 10
    Email: peter.klu...@averbis.com
    Web: https://averbis.com

    Headquarters: Freiburg im Breisgau
    Register Court: Amtsgericht Freiburg im Breisgau, HRB 701080
    Managing Directors: Dr. med. Philipp Daumke, Dr. Kornél Markó



Reply via email to