Interesting... I'm wondering how to arrange things so that for JCas class "x.y.z.Foo",
you could have an associated class or interface that could make use of the getters and setters for the features in the Foo type. -Marshall On 11/15/2019 11:34 AM, Richard Eckart de Castilho wrote: > On 15. Nov 2019, at 17:26, Marshall Schor <m...@schor.com> wrote: >> Also, you might not run the JCasGen code very often, because it only would >> need >> to be run if the type system changed. > I think with Java supporting default methods in interfaces these days, it > would be great > if there was a way to have an annotation type implement additional > interfaces. That could > allow for a nice decoupling of generated code and extra functionality if the > interfaces > e.g. inherit from the FeatureStructure interface and thereby would have > access to the > methods to get/set features. > > -- Richard
