We are deploying Windows 7 under our campus license, using a KMS server to 
activate running instances of Windows.

Aaron


On Oct 23, 2012, at 11:17 AM, Michael Jinks <[email protected]>
 wrote:

> Hi Aaron.
> 
> We chose not to use vSphere mainly because of licensing restrictions on
> the Windows versions we'd be allowed to deploy.  At least according to
> our license agreements, we can't use vSphere and a "desktop" class
> version of Windows.  If we want to deploy Windows 7, we have to do it on
> ESXi or another "standalone" virtualization platform.
> 
> Does that mesh with your experience?  Are you deploying Windows 7 in
> your environment?
> 
> Thanks,
> -mrj
> 
> 
> On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 03:08:15PM +0000, Aaron Coburn wrote:
>>   Michael,
>> 
>>   we are using a vCenter cluster for our VMware hosts. In this way, the
>>   vcl knows only about a single VM host, when actually there are several
>>   ESX servers behind the scenes. VMware then manages all of the resource
>>   and load balancing -- the VCL isn't really designed to manage this.
>>   This means that when one server is consuming too much CPU or memory,
>>   then the VM is "vMotioned" to another physical host.
>> 
>>   The downside of this is that it requires the more expensive
>>   (Enterprise) VMware license; also, depending on how you manage your
>>   datastore disk extents, you may run into VMware's 2TB disk limits
>>   (unless you are already using vSphere 5) -- note that you will need to
>>   use shared SAN storage across all of your ESX hosts in order to enable
>>   VMware's Distributed Resource Scheduler (that is what manages the load
>>   balancing).
>> 
>>   Aaron Coburn
>> 
>>   --
>>   Aaron Coburn
>>   Systems Administrator and Programmer
>>   Academic Technology Services, Amherst College
>>   [1][email protected]
>>   On Oct 23, 2012, at 10:38 AM, Michael Jinks <[2][email protected]>
>>   wrote:
>> 
>>     Hi List.
>>     We designed our deployment with the idea that we could use the VM
>>     limit
>>     setting in the Virtual Hosts configuration page.  Since that setting
>>     doesn't actually do anything, now I wonder, what are other sites
>>     doing
>>     in order to manage load on your virtual hosts?
>>     Related to that, any tips on doing load testing to see what our
>>     environment can handle given our expected work load, hardware setup
>>     and
>>     so forth?  When we thought we could adjust things on the fly with a
>>     slider, I was less concerned about knowing in advance what a single
>>     host
>>     can take.  Now I realize we'll need to be very careful in advance
>>     when
>>     it comes to assigning virtual computers to hosts, so any tips on
>>     planning and testing that would be welcome.
>>     Thanks.
>>     -mrj
>>     --
>>     Michael Jinks :: [3][email protected]
>>     University of Chicago IT Services
>> 
>> References
>> 
>>   1. mailto:[email protected]
>>   2. mailto:[email protected]
>>   3. mailto:[email protected]
> 
> -- 
> Michael Jinks :: [email protected] :: 773-469-9688
> University of Chicago IT Services

Reply via email to