Adam

Our AV is set to auto-update the definitions file, as it would be rather 
pointless to have AV and let this get stale. We have not observed any 
significant overhead of just the definition files updating, it's a rather 
lightweight operation. It has not been a concern for us. The main issue was to 
disable scheduled scans, as this obviously causes a lot of disk thrashing.


Mike Waldron
Systems Specialist
ITS - Research Computing Center
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

________________________________
From: Hechler, Adam [[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, December 03, 2012 8:58 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: using AV in virtual machines

Thanks everyone who replied already.

Aaron – curious as to why image creation privileges is one of the deciding 
factors. One of the things we talked about here was a user having a reservation 
and getting infected in a normal VM and since that would be on a local 
(private) network it can at least spread through any reserved VMs (am I correct 
in that?)

There was also concern, and maybe this is for another question, that VCL users 
also would have local drives mounted via RDP and a virus in a reserved image 
can then spread to a local host.

Michael – the overhead on the images is my concern. Especially since most 
enterprise AV products I’m aware of attempt to update almost immediately upon 
startup or login which is when the users would notice it the most.

For everyone – if you do have AV in your images, are you updating the images 
often to get the latest definition files? Have you configured the AV to not 
update automatically?  Forgive these seemingly simple questions, but on our 
normal desktops we just let the AV auto-update so it’s not an issue. But there 
is a performance hit to Windows upon startup or login. We’re just looking for 
the best experience for our users.

Thanks,
Adam

From: Aaron Coburn [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2012 4:43 PM
To: <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: using AV in virtual machines

We do not run anti-virus software in our VMs.

The main reason we don't is that we felt there are negligible security benefits 
while there are significant performance gains.

I should also mention that we really significantly restrict which users can 
create images. I would be more concerned about this if we opened up the image 
creation privileges to more people.


--
Aaron Coburn
Systems Administrator and Programmer
Academic Technology Services, Amherst College
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>




On Nov 30, 2012, at 10:03 AM, "Waldron, Michael H" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:


We are running anti-virus on our VMs because our security organization insists 
on it.

We do have it configured however not to run scheduled scans to reduce excess 
pounding on our backend storage. We run a scan when initially creating the 
image. Since the VM always reverts back to a clean image after a reservation, 
this satisfies our security group.

Mike Waldron
Systems Specialist
ITS - Research Computing Center
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
________________________________
From: Hechler, Adam [[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>]
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2012 9:56 AM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: using AV in virtual machines
Hello,

Can the rest of you running VCL in production tell me if you’re running 
Anti-Virus software in your VMs?

Can you explain briefly why you are or are not?

We’re trying to determine if we should install AV in our images or not.


Thank you,
Adam

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Adam Hechler
Senior Analyst /PC Systems Administrator
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
275 Windsor Street
Hartford, CT 06120 USA
Ph: 860-548-2446
Email: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Web: http://www.ewp.rpi.edu<http://www.ewp.rpi.edu/>
<image001.jpg><http://www.facebook.com/pages/Rensselaer-Hartford-Campus/216532895053858>
 <image002.jpg><https://twitter.com/#!/RPI_Hartford> 
<image003.jpg><http://www.youtube.com/user/RPIHartford>  
<image004.png><http://rpihartford.blogspot.com/>

Reply via email to