Hi, David, > So am I correct that I need two vm host profiles for each esxi host?
I believe that is correct. In our setup, we have some hosts with local storage and some hosts with shared backend storage. For those with local storage, the vcl connects directly to the esx host (not using vcenter -- vcenter is only used for those hosts with a shared, SAN-based storage). It may be the case that you could get this to work with vCenter by disabling DRS (vMotion), but it is a lot easier to just connect directly to the different hosts. Regards, Aaron Coburn On Jun 5, 2014, at 2:53 PM, David DeMizio <[email protected]> wrote: > So am I correct that I need two vm host profiles for each esxi host? I'll > have to have a better look at the VCL website. I'm just not clear on how this > is going to be setup. I've been using the vcenter profile since I started > experimenting with VCL. I guess each esxi host will have dedicated virtual > machines that will always run on that esxi host? > > > David DeMizio > Academic Systems Coordinator > Office of Information Technology > New College of Florida > Phone: 941-487-4222 | Fax: 941-487-4356 > www.ncf.edu > > > On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 2:06 PM, Dmitri Chebotarov <[email protected]> wrote: > Hmm... I'm not sure if this can be done with vCenter profile. I think > vCenter profile assumes you have shared storage. > > > You could add ESXi hosts directly to VCL, and then create local datastore in > each host. You may need to remove ESXi hosts from vCenter, as it won't allow > you to have the same local datastore name on each host. > > From: David DeMizio <[email protected]> > Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2014 12:34 PM > To: user > Subject: Re: Local storage > > Thanks Andy > > I guess I just need clarification on what type of vm host profile I will need > to use with this type of setup and if I need a separate vm host profile for > each of my esxi host servers? > > > David DeMizio > Academic Systems Coordinator > Office of Information Technology > New College of Florida > Phone: 941-487-4222 | Fax: 941-487-4356 > www.ncf.edu > > > On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 12:09 PM, Andy Kurth <[email protected]> wrote: > I haven't tried it, but apparently you can vMotion VMs without having shared > storage starting with 5.1: > > http://blogs.vmware.com/vsphere/2012/09/vmotion-without-shared-storage-requirement-does-it-have-a-name.html > > -Andy > > > On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 11:22 AM, David DeMizio <[email protected]> wrote: > Thank Dmitri, > > I'm getting a bit confused because the VM Working Directory Path pointing to > the local SSD which the other server knows nothing about. I'm currently using > the VMware Vcenter host profile will I need to change that and use the esxi > local storage profile? Seems like I'm going to need two virtual hosts using > the esxi local storage policy? > > > David DeMizio > Academic Systems Coordinator > Office of Information Technology > New College of Florida > Phone: 941-487-4222 | Fax: 941-487-4356 > www.ncf.edu > > > On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 10:22 AM, Dmitri Chebotarov <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi David > > I think it should work fine with local SSD storage on ESXi hosts. You still > may want to use a shared NFS storage for your images (Virtual Disk Path), but > you can point VM Working Directory Path to local SSD storage. > > -- > Thank you, > > Dmitri Chebotarov > VCL Sys Eng, Engineering & Architectural Support, TSD - Ent Servers & > Messaging > 223 Aquia Building, Ffx, MSN: 1B5 > Phone: (703) 993-6175 | Fax: (703) 993-3404 > > > From: David DeMizio <[email protected]> > Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2014 10:08 AM > To: user > Subject: Local storage > > > Hello, > > We have two servers with local Solid state storage in both of them that I > would like to start testing with VCL. Currently, I am using vsphere 5.5 with > the vcl vmware module to provision my nodes by using a SAN. Of course if I > plan to test VCL just using the local SSD drives than I will lose the ability > of vmotion, at least I think I will because each server will not have access > to the other servers SSDs. Can I still use the vmware module if I go this > route? Any other suggestions are appreciated. Thank you. > > -Dave > > > >
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
