Nathan Bubna wrote: > > For those curious about my reasons for asking: i'm looking at > IntrospectorBase and the classes above and seeing slight risk of > ConcurrentModificationExceptions in the way listeners are handled. > This would be trivially fixed by synchronizing the add/removeListener > methods. However, i'm hoping to use more fine-grained synchronization > in those classes that would require potentially more hassle than the > risk. If it brings more stability and preformance, than please "cut in the code" as "deep" as you wish :).
Even more, for huge performance increases, most users would even sacrifice some API compatibility (since for performance, many would sacrifice this completly by moving to other solutions :) ). Thnx. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-SURVEY--IntrospectorCache%28Listener%29-tp18645496p18648273.html Sent from the Velocity - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
