All righty, then, that makes sense, this is a fairly annoying bug. I have uploaded a new release candidate, XmlBeans 2.3.0-RC4 that includes a fix for it (turns out I had a patch for it on my box...) I am going to send out a new vote e-mail shortly however since this is the 4th RC...
Radu -----Original Message----- From: Garth Patil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, May 19, 2007 10:13 PM To: user@xmlbeans.apache.org Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [VOTE] XmlBeans 2.3.0 Release Hi All, I am not voter, but I really think a fix should be included for this bug before a 2.3.0 release is made: http://www.mail-archive.com/user@xmlbeans.apache.org/msg02042.html Given that a corruption of the Piccolo parser is not recoverable without a restart, it appears to be a pretty critical flaw. The patch I submitted takes a pretty blunt approach to the problem, by just assuming that the Piccolo instance is unusable if the parse() method throws any kind of exception. I don't know if this is the "right" solution, but I have been using it in production since March, and haven't seen the fatal parser corruption problem again. In any case, thanks for all the great work everyone has done to get this release ready! Best, Garth On 5/17/07, Radu Preotiuc-Pietro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Please vote on the release of XmlBeans 2.3.0 as it currently exists on > http://xmlbeans.apache.org/dist as xmlbeans-2.3.0-RC3*. If the vote > turns out positive, these archives are going to become the final > release and be renamed to xmlbeans-2.3.0*, then signed and uploaded to > the download servers. > > Everyone is welcome to make their opinion heard, however the only > binding votes are those of commiters and PMC members. In order for the > vote to pass, we need a majority approval and at least three binding > +1 votes. > > This vote will end Tuesday, May 22nd, 2007 (End Of Day), so make sure > to cast your vote by then as follows: > > [ ] +1 - I am in favor of this release, and can help [ ] +0 - I am > in favor of this release, but cannot help [ ] -0 - I am not in favor > of this release [ ] -1 - I am against this proposal (must include a > reason) > > Radu > > Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may contain information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and affiliated entities, that may be confidential, proprietary, copyrighted and/or legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient, and have received this message in error, please immediately return this by email and then delete it. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may contain information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and affiliated entities, that may be confidential, proprietary, copyrighted and/or legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient, and have received this message in error, please immediately return this by email and then delete it. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
