It's difficult to assess the "correctness", because in the XMLSchema spec, the semantics of Schema composition are left to the implementors.
What I can say is that what you noticed is "by design". We took the view that "import" means "reference the given Schema doc", while "include" means "treat the given Schema doc as if it were part of the current Schema doc". This makes sense if you think about the case of chameleon includes where the same Schema doc can produce different Schema components depending on where it is included from. We tried to keep it simple and correct. Radu > -----Original Message----- > From: Jose Manuel Valladares Pernas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2007 9:09 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Behavior of include/import to avoid regenerate classes > > Hello, > I would like to know if it is correct the different behavior > of the import and include elements regarding the generation > of java classes. > > Let me explain. > > We have two schema files: A.xsd and B.xsd. > Both in namespace http://www.namespace.com. > > (Scenario 1) > In A.xsd we use: > <xs:import schemaLocation="B.xsd" > namespace="http://www.namespace.com"; /> > > Then we do: > scomp of B.xsd, > Create the classes of B.xsd > > scomp of A.xsd using the classes of B.xsd in the classpath > > What we get is that the second scomp only produces the > classes of A.xsd, skipping the ones of B.xsd, because they > were already generated. > > > (Scenario 2) > In A.xsd we use: > <xs:include schemaLocation="B.xsd" /> > > Then we do: > scomp of B.xsd, > Create the classes of B.xsd > > scomp of A.xsd using the classes of B.xsd in the classpath > > What we get is that the second scomp produces the classes of > A.xsd, and also > the ones of B.xsd, even when we have these classes already in > the classpath. > > > So we would like to know if this behavior is correct. > In some schema files provided to us the builders decided to > use include and > now we are getting the same classes regenerated several times. > To avoid that we changed the include for imports and > everything is working > fine, but we want to know the reason of this difference. > > Thank you very much for your help and your time. > > Best regards, > Jose Manuel Valladares > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may contain information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and affiliated entities, that may be confidential, proprietary, copyrighted and/or legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient, and have received this message in error, please immediately return this by email and then delete it. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
