Flavio, What you say is correct, but the original poster does have a point that many of these warnings are to be expected and there is a heuristic that might assist in distinguishing some of these cases so that false alarms in the logs could be decreased.
That doesn't seem like a big deal to me, but different people have different itches. In my experience, restarting a ZK cluster from zero almost never happens. On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 8:36 AM, Ted Dunning <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 12:15 AM, Sampath Perera > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> >> Hhmmm, I think this is a bit different isn't it? Here we know that the >> first >> server to come will be failing to connect to the other as they are not yet >> up. Anyway our real issue is the warning. >> > > We know that. > > But how does the server know that it is the first server? That is the > whole point of the leader election. You might just have a server rejoining > a cluster. Or you might have a cluster that has been turned off. Or a > cluster with 2 out of 5 machines off and we tried to touch the other down > machine before the others. > > >> > >> > Would you like to suggest a patch? >> > >> >> Of course I do.. will prepare a patch and attach. >> > > Great! > >
