Hi Rich, I am nearly OK with it. Just question - is it good to do it also for "V2.2" string in case of Apache and its modules? I think major.minor should stay in case of Apache (and other SW which is develivered in several different major.minor versions).
Best regards, Milan Rich Burridge píše v út 15. 11. 2011 v 18:10 -0800: > Hi, > > Could I please get a code review for my fix for: > > 7060335 several components contain version in their legacy actions' > descriptions > http://monaco.us.oracle.com/detail.jsf?cr=7060335 > > Webrev is at: > > http://jurassic.us.oracle.com/~richb/7060335-v1/ > > x86 Workspace (with each affected component built) is at: > > /net/stard.us.oracle.com/tank/ws/UL/7060335/ > > I did a "nightly" build. Log files for this are under: > > > /net/stard.us.oracle.com/tank/ws/UL/7060335/i386/nightly/logs.2011-11-15.12:20 > / > > See the Bugster CR for more details (include a couple of attachments > which are the 'before' and 'after' for all the legacy lines in the various > Userland .p5m files). > > Thanks. > > _______________________________________________ > userland-discuss mailing list > userland-discuss@opensolaris.org > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/userland-discuss _______________________________________________ userland-discuss mailing list userland-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/userland-discuss
