Well, I'm not sure. I tried this:
hg clone ssh://[email protected]//gates/gate -b s11_sru u_sru
cd u_sru
gmake setup
cd components/unrar
gmake publish
result is:
========================================================================
...
Lint engine setup...
PHASE ITEMS
5 4302/4302
Starting lint run...
WARNING pkglint.manifest004 last name component unrar in package name
clashes across
pkg://solaris/archiver/[email protected],5.11-0.175.1.0.0.3.576:20111115T005605Z
pkg:/archiver/[email protected],5.11-0.175.0.1.0.0.541
ERROR pkglint.dupaction001.1 path usr/bin/unrar is a duplicate delivered
by pkg:/archiver/[email protected],5.11-0.175.0.1.0.0.541
pkg://solaris/archiver/[email protected],5.11-0.175.1.0.0.3.576:20111115T005605Z
under all variant combinations
ERROR pkglint.dupaction001.1 path usr/share/man/man1/unrar.1 is a
duplicate delivered by pkg:/archiver/[email protected],5.11-0.175.0.1.0.0.541
pkg://solaris/archiver/[email protected],5.11-0.175.1.0.0.3.576:20111115T005605Z
under all variant combinations
gmake: *** [/builds/vm156888/u_sru/components/unrar/build/.linted-i386] Error 1
========================================================================
Not sure if that is relevant, but sfwcfi reports different version of
unrar than clean S11
sfwcfi:
pkg://solaris/archiver/[email protected],5.11-0.175.0.0.0.2.537:20111019T091129Z
S11 from iso image reports it to be (http://ipkg.us.oracle.com/solaris11/dev/)
pkg://solaris/archiver/[email protected],5.11-0.175.1.0.0.3.576:20111115T005605Z
and userland tries to build:
pkg:/archiver/[email protected],5.11-0.175.0.1.0.0.541
The lint cache is built from http://ipkg.us.oracle.com/solaris11/dev/
where unrar is 0.175.1.0.0.3.576. So userland tries to build older
package IMO.
SRU branch has:
TRUNK_ID ?= 0.175
UPDATENUM ?= 0
SRUNUM ?= 1
PLATNUM ?= 0
BUILDID ?= 0
NIGHTLYID ?= $(shell hg tip --template '{rev}\n')
default branch has:
TRUNK_ID ?= 0.175
UPDATENUM ?= 1
SRUNUM ?= 0
PLATNUM ?= 0
BUILDID ?= 3
NIGHTLYID ?= $(shell hg tip --template '{rev}\n')
The difference is in UPDATENUM. IMO UPDATENUM should be 1.
> What is wrong with sfwcfi? It doesn't look like it was updated to
> any U1 build yet.
>
> I used sfwcfi for my S11 SRU push not so long time ago.
>
> Note that I had separate workspace for SRU and Update.
>
> Petr
>
> Dne 21.11.11 12:24, Vladimir Marek napsal(a):
> >So I can't build s11-sru branch on sfwcfi.us.oracle.com.
> >
> >Do we have clean S11 build machines?
> >
> >There are already putbacks on s11-sru branch, how did you build/tested
> >them?
> >
> >Thank you
>
> _______________________________________________
> userland-discuss mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/userland-discuss
_______________________________________________
userland-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/userland-discuss
