Your php tests are ok Rich.

No further comments.
Ok by me.

Can someone else please review this code?

craig

----- craig.mohr...@oracle.com wrote:

> The code looks ok to me.
> Because this change is so important I would recommended at least a 2nd
> pair of eyes.
> 
> I'm still working on the php test results.
> They look pretty close to what I generated months ago but I'm
> producing a new baseline now to see where we stand.
> So more to come from me on this.
> 
> craig
> 
> ----- rich.burri...@oracle.com wrote:
> 
> > The nightly build for x86 has now completed. Logs are under:
> > 
> >   
> >
> /net/stard.us.oracle.com/tank/ws/UL/autotools-update/i386/nightly/logs.2012-01-30.07:18/
> > 
> > The only failure is python27, which hard-wires the version of
> > autoconf
> > it needs in .../components/python/python27/patches/00-bits.patch
> > 
> > Initially the CBE that builds Userland when these changes
> integrate,
> > will be the
> > one based on Solaris 11 (FCS), so that means that this patch cannot
> be
> > applied
> > until the Userland CBE uses the new autoconf. I've reverted the
> change
> > to this
> > file, opened a new bug (CR #7141080) and generated a new webrev:
> > 
> >    http://jurassic.us.oracle.com/~richb/autotools-update-v2/
> > 
> > Thanks.
> > 
> > 
> > -------- Original Message --------
> > Subject:    Code review request for autoconf and automake updates.
> > Date:       Mon, 30 Jan 2012 10:28:14 -0800
> > From:       Rich Burridge <rich.burri...@oracle.com>
> > To:         Userland-Discuss <userland-discuss@opensolaris.org>
> > CC:         Brian Cameron <brian.came...@oracle.com>,
> "dave....@oracle.com"
> > <dave....@oracle.com>
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > Could I please get a code review for the changes for:
> > 
> >    6886388 Ship automake-1.11.2
> >    http://monaco.us.oracle.com/detail.jsf?cr=6886388
> > 
> >    7127352 autoconf should be updated to the latest version
> >    http://monaco.us.oracle.com/detail.jsf?cr=7127352
> > 
> >    7132411 Various Userland components will need adjusting when
> > autoconf
> >    and automake are updated
> >    http://monaco.us.oracle.com/detail.jsf?cr=7132411
> > 
> > Webrev is at:
> > 
> >    http://jurassic.us.oracle.com/~richb/autotools-update-v1/
> > 
> > x86 workspace is at:
> > 
> >    /net/stard.us.oracle.com/tank/ws/UL/autotools-update/
> > 
> > SPARC workspace is at:
> > 
> >    /net/wonderland.us.oracle.com/builds/richb/autotools-update/
> > 
> > (I have full nightly builds going in each of those workspaces at
> the
> > moment, which will hopefully be finished this afternoon).
> > 
> > Userland successfully builds with these new autoconf and automake
> > packages. Alan Coopersmith has confirmed that the X consolidation
> > builds too. The Desktop group is in the process of testing them on
> > their consolidation.
> > 
> > There are currently two versions of automake available (1.9.6 and
> > 1.10).
> > Userland and X will not need these versions when automake 1.11.2
> > integrates.
> > Until it can be shown that this is also true for Desktop, then the
> > plan is that the new version of automake will be an addition
> version
> > (and the default one).
> > 
> > See the Bugster CR's for more details.
> > 
> > Thanks.
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > userland-discuss mailing list
> > userland-discuss@opensolaris.org
> > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/userland-discuss
> _______________________________________________
> userland-discuss mailing list
> userland-discuss@opensolaris.org
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/userland-discuss
_______________________________________________
userland-discuss mailing list
userland-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/userland-discuss

Reply via email to